[BunnySlippers]

You have stated you KNOW DW is a CHILD MOLESTOR. I have asked for proof. You don't have any. You can't show any.

Please try to hold on. :)

In my opinion, he is a molester. I am exercising my right as an American citizen to have an opinion ... only that.. But I have not yet heard the proof that I hear exists about other suspects. That is still a myth.

[UCANSEE2]

But I have not yet heard the proof that I hear exists about other suspects. That is still a myth.

Fair enough. If you go back to the Trial transcripts, since you say you have read them, or if you want to go back on these threads, there is testimony that police found PRINTS in the VD home, on the bannister rail,in The Bedroom,that DO NOT MATCH DW, DO NOT MATCH any of the VD's or their party guests. The police made no attempt to follow up on whose prints these might be, they admitted to it in testimony, and when asked why,said because they weren't DW's.

[It's me]

In my opinion, he is a molester. I am exercising my right as an American citizen to have an opinion ... only that.. But I have not yet heard the proof that I hear exists about other suspects. That is still a myth.

Really? How about the unidentified prints in the van Dam house? To whom do they belong?