Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rheo
Ok, not a full handprint, but more than a fingerprint. As we know,the important thing is that it establishes her presence in the bedroom of the MH. Where did you learn they did not test for prints over the entire cabinet? Seems inconceivable that they would not.
140 posted on 07/02/2002 8:39:56 PM PDT by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: luvbach1
Jeff Graham testified to it...when he was reviewing the latents that were given to him by the techs that printed..he noticed in the picture there was no print dust..so he went back to the MH in March to do that and look for the earring back.

The tech did also not notate if the prints found of Danielle L and Jennifer were on the outside of that window or the inside.

147 posted on 07/02/2002 8:43:00 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

To: luvbach1; All
Here is a pic of the jacket stain if you or others haven't seen it yet..the one one the right is a test spot for knowns..the blood stain, which tested to be Danielles measured at 1 3/16"....the carpet blood stain by the dresser/closet was 1/4" in diameter.


151 posted on 07/02/2002 8:45:55 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson