Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Westerfield attorney's begin defense: Dusek STUNNED by Defense calling for Keith Stone. Barb next?
Union Trib ^ | July 2, 2002 | Union Trib

Posted on 07/02/2002 6:10:56 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-442 next last
To: BunnySlippers
What proof do you have of this?

There are several options here:

(1)Go back and invest a little time reading previous threads where this has been discussed over and over, explained in intricated detail, and proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.

It is something called courtesy of trying to understand what has been discussed so you don't force others to re-educate every person that comes to the thread.

I would be happy to take time to explain all the instances (fingerprints, hairs, fibers,etc) where police testified in court that they did not bother to identify this item or that, or id prints, or even take prints from certain items.

Problem is that I know you have been on these threads lurking and replying, so you have read this information just like the rest of us.

That you have read it and choose to play dumb and ignore it means that me telling you would do no good, so I choose not to waste my time

If you are serious about learning, go back and read the threads. There are links, or we can direct you.

THis is my favorite qoute:

"I understand your problem.
I'll be glad to help you out.
Which way did you come in?"

81 posted on 07/02/2002 7:48:35 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Disquieting Disclosures -
The Unbearable Sadness of the Danielle Van Dam Story
by Jennifer King, Senior Editor

 

"The Heretical Housewife"

 Danielle Van Dam (1994-2002)altThere should be no quarter given to those who abuse and defile the trust placed in them by an innocent child. Child molesters are heinous creatures, destroyers of the future who themselves deserve to be dispatched in the most hideous way possible. Whoever murdered Danielle Van Dam (right), whoever dumped her soft little body into dirty scrub brush by the side of the road to be mauled and desecrated by the fangs of wild animals, deserves to die an equally painful and inglorious death. And, Danielle’s parents, Damon and Brenda Van Dam, deserve our heartfelt sympathy for their disastrous loss of their little girl in such a horrid manner.

However, disquieting revelations have been floating around this case since Danielle disappeared on February 1st, 2002. First disclosed by radio talk-show host Rick Roberts, these rumors have been linked to an unnamed San Diego Law Enforcement Officer (LEO). The rumors alleged that the Van Dam’s were “swingers”, who had a special room set up in their garage - with inside locks - where eager participants had orgies replete with drinking and pot smoking.

The Van Dam’s, on their appearances on Larry King Live and America’s Most Wanted, seemed evasive, dodging questions about their personal lifestyle. They also almost immediately hired a PR firm, whose spokesman likewise deflected this line of questioning without denying it outright.

Thursday, in court hearings, both Brenda and Damon Van Dam seemed to verify some of these allegations. At the very least, the Van Dam behavior and home life can be said to have been highly unusual.

Brenda Van Dam (KNSD-TV)David Westerfield (KNSD-TV)Brenda Van Dam (left) gave some staggering testimony. Among the stunners were the revelation that she had left 7-year old Danielle alone, trying on clothes, in Mervyn’s, while she hunted down her 5 and 10-year old sons who were “at other stores” in the same mall. Then, Brenda admitted that she had noticed her neighbor, David Westerfield (right), the accused killer, at a Poway bar, “Dad’s”, the previous Friday, January 25th. Van Dam, who was with two friends, Barbara and Denise, admitted under questioning by the defense attorney, that the three women had been dancing together, suggestively, with Barbara even attempting to fondle Brenda’s breasts.

Denise KemalAccording to testimony, the following week, Brenda Van Dam, Danielle and her brother went over to Westerfield’s house in order to sell him some Girl Scout cookies. Westerfield asked Van Dam why she hadn’t introduced him to her friends, who, he allegedly said, “looked really fun“. She also testified that Westerfield had told her that he often had “adult BBQ’s”, at which, according to Van Dam, he said, “He would provide the salad, but everyone had to bring their own meat.“ Van Dam testified that she told Westerfield to meet her and her friends at Dad’s the following Friday, and she would then introduce him to her friends.

On February 1st, the day Danielle would disappear, the following events transpired, according to Van Dam’s testimony. Brenda returned with the kids at approximately 5:30, then went out to pick up pizza for dinner, leaving the children alone in the house. After dinner, her two girlfriends, Denise and Barbara, came over and stayed about 15 minutes. The three women each had a beer, then they and Brenda’s husband Damon, met in the garage, where they smoked part of a joint (marijuana cigarette).Keith Stone

At approximately 8:30 p.m., the three women went to “Dad’s” where they met up with Westerfield. Westerfield bought them all drinks (Brenda testified that she had three cranberry-vodkas, one shot of tequila and one Red Bull). Westerfield says he danced with Van Dam, she initially denied it, but testified under oath that she “couldn’t recall.” She did admit to “slow dancing” with an older man, and testified that Denise and Barbara were “sexual dancing” with each other and with other women in the bar.

Van Dam also testified that the girlfriends met up with two men named “Rich and Keith.” Rich was alleged to be the pot connection, in later testimony given by Damon Van Dam. Supposedly, Keith was very interested in Barbara, and confided to Brenda that he had “popped a “V”, apparently referring to a Viagra pill. He allegedly asked Brenda to facilitate a tryst between the two.

At 2:00 a.m., when closing time was announced, the three women got in Brenda’s truck (allegedly taking hits from the same joint they had smoked earlier) and the two men drove in another vehicle to the Van Dam home. Damon, who was allegedly asleep in his underwear in his own bed, was awakened by Barbara, who climbed on top of the bed. Damon admits to “kissing” Barbara, and “rubbing her back”.

Rich BradyBrenda Van Dam came upstairs about 15 minutes later, and informed the couple that they were being “rude” and that they should join the rest of the ensemble downstairs. Yet, after pizza, the remaining guests allegedly left. The Van Dam’s assert that they went to bed at approximately 2:30 a.m. They did not consider checking on their children then, and did not realize that Danielle was missing until approximately 9:30 a.m. the next morning.

Danielle’s naked and decomposed body was found by volunteer searchers on February 27th.

Whether her parent’s lifestyle had anything to do with her death is debatable. Surely, the Van Dams love their children, aged 10, 7 (Danielle) and 5. Yet the Van Dams appear to have engaged in a lot of activities which could be directly and indirectly injurious to their family. There aren’t too many families, for example, where the mother leaves her young children alone while she runs out to pick up dinner. There aren’t too many devoted mothers who routinely spend Friday nights dirty-dancing at the local bar. Wise parents who exercise sound oversight do not partake in the heavy drinking and pot smoking which appear to have occurred on a regular basis in the Van Dam household.

And, most parents simply do not invite a group of drunken, pot-addled barflys over to their home at 2 o’clock in the morning, while their innocent children sleep only a few rooms away. One wonders whether either Damon or Brenda’s “friend” Barbara, ever considered what the children would think should they awaken and find their father with a woman who wasn‘t their mother rolling around on their parent’s bed.

Many dark theories abound as to what might actually have transpired between the Van Dams and David Westerfield. According to the defense attorney, witnesses have offered to come forward to testify that, not only DID Brenda Van Dam dance with Westerfield, but she did so exclusively and in a suggestive manner. Nevertheless, Westerfield may indeed be solely responsible for the murder of Danielle, and if he is found guilty than he should fry.

However, the Van Dam’s do appear to have fostered, at the very minimum, a home environment where the least suitable people would often be around their most precious assets. Their little girl, unfortunately, was the one who paid the price. ***

82 posted on 07/02/2002 7:49:16 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Because there's been a concerted effort in this forum to shut up people who feel that a child molester (Westerfield) has been caught

lol

83 posted on 07/02/2002 7:49:35 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
Nobody knows just when he did the dastardly deed but I don't think the case will hinge on that.

I agree. In fact I understand that it is NOT incumbent on the prosecution to lay down every step of the crime ... how he got her from point A to point B ... but rather that he had the means and the motive. And the DNA.

84 posted on 07/02/2002 7:49:47 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
That you have read it and choose to play dumb and ignore it means that me telling you would do no good, so I choose not to waste my time

Don't be silly. Point me to any article ... ANY PROOF AT ALL that no time was spent on any other person or persons. Your answer was vague in the extreme. Proof.

85 posted on 07/02/2002 7:51:56 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
If Westerfield testifies that he went on a trip and never saw the girl, the jury will have to act on that.

The prosecution has already provided this to the jury. The defense LAWYER can provide this to the jury. It is a matter of record.

86 posted on 07/02/2002 7:53:36 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: fatima
Thanks.I didn't know that in an opening statement that they could say what they want and not prove it.It would really help if they could because I am lost to how this happened,got in and got out of the house.

As others theorized earlier, I believe that they rushed to take this to trial before the fiber, dna, etc. results came back, very sure that they would prove his guilt. Unfortunately for the prosecution things have not worked out as they expected so they're stuck looking like liars. I can only hope that the jury remembers or has taken notes during the opening statement. Whether they did or not, I'm sure Feldman will be only too happy to refresh their memory. That's why DW is paying him the really big bucks :-)

87 posted on 07/02/2002 7:53:39 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
How do they refute the blood evidence and the handprint in the motor home? Not to mention the fiber evidence. Pointing out inconsequential procedural errors by the lab technicians doesn't negate the conclusions to me. I don't the jury will be persuaded to disregard them either. Much of the prosecution's case is circumstantial, that's true, but the physical evidence is also damning.This is not the OJ jury.I could be wrong; that's why they'll have to finish the trial.
88 posted on 07/02/2002 7:55:23 PM PDT by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
" Only by the jury ... The general public is not held to the same standard."

Two things. 1. The jury has been instructed to presume innocence until all the evidence is in. 2. If the jury is really watching the same evidence we're watching, they'll have questions. Probably many, perhaps all, of the same ones we have. In a sense, the jury is the general public, just a small sample of us.

89 posted on 07/02/2002 7:55:30 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
How much time and efforts did they spend on the 200 other neighbors houses they searched?
90 posted on 07/02/2002 7:55:33 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I got it already and provided a summary of it at the top of the thread. Thanks anyway.
91 posted on 07/02/2002 7:56:15 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; UCANSEE2
Thanks for the pings. I can't wait to see Feldman in action. This is going to get interesting.
92 posted on 07/02/2002 7:56:51 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: fatima
Not a lawyer; who's the he to which you refer?
93 posted on 07/02/2002 7:57:09 PM PDT by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: goldenstategirl
It was pure hell today....just read previous thread..
94 posted on 07/02/2002 7:57:43 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
No Prob...
95 posted on 07/02/2002 7:58:06 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
In a sense, the jury is the general public, just a small sample of us.

Well, cool. It's just that they are held to a different standard than we are. I'm sick and tired of the Westerfield fans pretending that we can't judge someone that we TRULY believe is a child molester.

96 posted on 07/02/2002 7:58:18 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Interesting. What is your theory for how DW got into the house, waited for his chance, then spirited the wee one out--without leaving so much as a fingerprint or hair? And while being drunk, too, I should add. And then, how did he spirit her to the motorhome? No trace of her--not so much as a hair or a fingerprint in the SUV. I'll entertain thoughts of his guilt if someone can answer these questions reasonably.


97 posted on 07/02/2002 7:59:20 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
Much of the prosecution's case is circumstantial, that's true, but the physical evidence is also damning.

Most attorneys say that a circumstantial case is stronger. An eyewitness can be impeached by their eyesite, their motivation and their ability to see in certain conditions. Circumstantial cases are very much okay.

As we speak, Michael Skakel (the Kennedy cousin) is sitting in jail on a circumstantial case 27 years old ... and NO DNA evidence.

98 posted on 07/02/2002 8:02:24 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
<" Because there's been a concerted effort in this forum to shut up people who feel that a child molester (Westerfield) has been caught."

Ludicrous. There has, however, been a concerted effort to silence those of us who still have questions about the evidence, or lack of it.

99 posted on 07/02/2002 8:02:27 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
Thanks,did not read the we.
100 posted on 07/02/2002 8:03:23 PM PDT by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-442 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson