Westerfield attorney's begin defense: Dusek STUNNED by Defense calling for Keith Stone. Barb next?

Union Trib ^ | July 2, 2002 | Union Trib

[skipjackcity]

"I find it extremely difficult to believe if one kidnapped a child and went on a jaunt over the weekend, that when one was questioned about it one would say "we" and include the kidnapped child in the conversation."...I have to admit, that would be one extreme example of a Freudian slip, and is just too much to believe, especially if she were already dead.

[Jaded]

I think he's innocent.

[Rheo]

The MH was also parked in that neighborhood.

Danielle also sold cookies to DW last year at his house...they stopped mentioning that for some reason.

[UCANSEE2]

We can form an opinion, we can talk about the case!!!

Yes, and we are. You ask me to prove what I say. I clarify what I said and explain my proof.

I ask you questions or for proof of what you say, and you won't answer. If you can't respond to questions, do not ask any. If you don't want to prove what you believe, don't ask others to.

That is what I am saying.

[BunnySlippers]

You have stated you KNOW DW is a CHILD MOLESTOR. I have asked for proof. You don't have any. You can't show any.

Please try to hold on. :)

In my opinion, he is a molester. I am exercising my right as an American citizen to have an opinion ... only that.. But I have not yet heard the proof that I hear exists about other suspects. That is still a myth.

[UCANSEE2]

, possibly opening the cabinet door and NOT laying on the bed as some have been posting.

Yeah, but you and I and others are interested in the truth, even if it proves DW guilty.

Others don't care about the truth, they KNOW DW is A CHILD MOLESTOR and A MURDERER. They don't even need a trial. Just ask them! (of course, they don't seem to want to answer any questions, your honor. Since they won't testify in their own defense, ELECTROCUTE THEM)

[Jaded]

2 Fingerprints on the cabinet left ring and left middle. Partial palm print on the front driver's side window. Hair on bath mat. 1/4 in drop of blood on carpet in front of bathroom, 3/16 in on jacket. That is the overwhelming evidence.

Then what about the other hairs found? What about the other prints? Why did they not dust all of the RV for prints?

[BunnySlippers]

I think he's innocent.

And I applaud your ability to have an opinion BEFORE the trial is over in the face of such flack from the "on the fencers".

[UCANSEE2]

So, you aren't going to answer even one question, are you?

[BunnySlippers]

ELECTROCUTE THEM)

Just a wee bit hysterical here ... nighty night UCAN. Visions of angels ...

[RnMomof7]

My opinion based on the evidence

What evidence has been produced that he ever molested a little girl Bunny? Even the shrinks on CTV expressed doubt he was a molester as he does not "fit"the profile..What PROOF do you have that the DA has not found (they may need you and your insight)

Do you have proof that Daniele was molested?

PROOF Bunny not you "Because i said so"

[BunnySlippers]

So, you aren't going to answer even one question, are you?

I answered your questions. I will stay up 5 minutes more to sooth your furrowed brow. But your questions were addressed.

[UCANSEE2]

But I have an aversion to people who say they are "fence-sitters" when they are not ...

SO that is your argument and explanation for why you believe DW is guilty and why you KNOW he is a CHILD MOLESTOR?

[Politicalmom]

I believe the partial palm print on the window was Danielle L.'s was it not?

[BunnySlippers]

PROOF Bunny not you "Because i said so"

What is it that you are not understanding. I have stated over and over that it is my opinion. How about you provide proof that no one else was considered?

[RnMomof7]

I have been repeatedly condemned for having an opinion

WE all have an opinion you claim evidence..and we all want to see it.

We read theses threads ..listen to the trial..and we see no evidence that he has ever molested a child..so show us!

[BunnySlippers]

SO that is your argument and explanation for why you believe DW is guilty and why you KNOW he is a CHILD MOLESTOR?

Yoiu and I have listened to the evidence. You see nothing and I see a murderer.

[BunnySlippers]

We read theses threads ..listen to the trial..and we see no evidence that he has ever molested a child..so show us!

Show us no one else was considered.

[RnMomof7]

I think he is innocent too.

[Politicalmom]

Too intellectual, you know. The proper term is "Fry him!!".

Get it right!! : )