Skip to comments.
High anxieties : What the WHO doesn't want you to know about cannabis
New Scientist ^
Posted on 07/02/2002 8:56:30 AM PDT by WindMinstrel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 321-334 next last
To: Destructor
I have read it in various places. Don't have any sources handy to link to at this time but will search them out when time permits.
As someone who smokes cigarettes and someone who smoked a lot of pot in college, my personal experience would lead me to believe the stuff I have read that there is no nicotine in pot. If there is, the amount is so minute as to not matter.
Nicotine is HIGHLY addictive and if pot had nicotine even approaching that of cigarettes it would be as addictive as cigarettes. And pot is not addictive. At least not in the physical way that nicotine and other drugs are. Mentally addictive? For some, yes. But not physically addictive.
Whens the last time you saw pot heads needing to take a 'toke break' every hour at the office? Now how often do you see smokers taking 'smoke breaks' at the office?
To: WindMinstrel
Pot makes you stupid! Don't ask me how I know this.
Should it be illegal? Well I dunno. I think it should be illegal for me. And for my kids.
62
posted on
07/02/2002 12:46:16 PM PDT
by
SBprone
To: A Ruckus of Dogs
"The logic of marijuana being illegal escapes me."
My neighbor told me that when alcohol was made legal again, after Prohibition, the feds had too many agents running around with not enough to do. Marijuana and other drugs were legal at that time. So they made them illegal so the FBI wouldn't have to lay off their agents. Who knows if it's true?
Carolyn
63
posted on
07/02/2002 12:46:21 PM PDT
by
CDHart
To: MEGoody
The report said that some succeptable people can react that way. But the same can be said of many prescribed, or not, legal substances. This, however, is the first time I've ever heard of MJ contributing as such. How many people do you hear of killing themselves while drunk?
EBUCK
64
posted on
07/02/2002 12:48:55 PM PDT
by
EBUCK
To: Dead Corpse
Reminds me of that old Loverboy song "A Pigs and an Elephants DNA Just Won't Splice"
65
posted on
07/02/2002 12:49:06 PM PDT
by
Dakmar
To: Dead Corpse
Direct cut and paste from your source re: Cannabis Sativa
. Cannabis also contains choline, eugenol, guaiacol, nicotine, and piperidine (C.S.I.R., 1948-1976), all listed as toxins by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health.
66
posted on
07/02/2002 12:51:38 PM PDT
by
Gabz
To: Dakmar
Sorry Dakmar, I hated Loverboy's attempt at music so the reference is kinda lost. Stole my pig/elephant analogy wholesale from a South Park episode. ;-)
To: Destructor
Conspiracy, certainly. Leftist? Hardly. Unless you consider a very large portion of this site "Leftist". Face it. MJ is, at its worst, as bad as alchohol (certainly far less harmfull but FTSOA..) yet it's use and possession is in the same felony class that Heroin and Cocain are in. Does that make sense?
EBUCK
68
posted on
07/02/2002 12:53:20 PM PDT
by
EBUCK
To: Gabz
Missed that part. Good catch. Points for Gabz and Destroyer.
Now for the $64,000 question; Is it a trace substance or is there more than in tobacco as Destroyer was trying to assert?
Thanks for playing. We'll make sure to hand out copies of our home game.
To: Phantom Lord
Aw, now Phantom you know that's not an argument. How many people have you known that started their day with pot, got high at lunch, had their "4:30 buzz," and then ended their day getting high "to help them sleep?" It might not be physically addictive, but it's sure as hell psychologically addictive!
To: Dead Corpse
LOL, there was no Loverboy song like that, it was from same episode of South Park.
71
posted on
07/02/2002 12:57:08 PM PDT
by
Dakmar
To: Dead Corpse
It'd be like trying to breed a pot bellied pig to an elephant. The first thing you have to do is get them good and drunk.
To: Dead Corpse
SouthPark refs will not go unnoticed by me!!!
EBUCK
73
posted on
07/02/2002 12:59:12 PM PDT
by
EBUCK
To: Destructor
There is a HUGE difference between physical addition and physcological addiction.
Smokers have a strong and controling PHYSICAL addiction to nicotine.
And that would be 4:20, not 4:30.
To: Destructor
had their "4:30 buzz,"I believe that the buzz is at 4:20 traditionaly.
EBUCK
75
posted on
07/02/2002 1:01:05 PM PDT
by
EBUCK
To: Phantom Lord
Smokers have a strong and controling PHYSICAL addiction to nicotine.
I gave up Copenhagen just about 1 year ago now. I still get cravings -- almost on a daily basis. Damned straight it's a physical addiction.
Of course, that doesn't mean tobacco should be illegal, either.
To: WindMinstrel
Did you use any aids (not AIDS) to help you quit? I've been chewing for going on 12 years now and I'm ready to kick.
EBUCK
77
posted on
07/02/2002 1:04:28 PM PDT
by
EBUCK
To: EBUCK
I tried going cold turkey, and it didn't quite work. I then tried the patch, and that was counter-productive. I finally tried hypnosis, and that was just enough to do it.
That's not to say that hypnosis was painless, mind you. I went through full withdrawals, which were even worse because they were unexpected. I managed to get through it, though.
To: WindMinstrel
cannabis is safer than alcohol or tobacco.Which is like saying diabetes is not as bad as cancer or a heart attack.
To: Dead Corpse
I seriously doubt the amount of nicotine incannabis equally that of tobacco, probably more along the lines of the amounts in tomatos and potatoes.
80
posted on
07/02/2002 1:08:14 PM PDT
by
Gabz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 321-334 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson