[FreedominJesusChrist]

I am actually quite surprised that you remembered I said that, but thanks for reminding me. Like I said to Howlin a few posts up, I have no problem with some legitimate questions people have concerning JW's budget or the lack of activity in some their lawsuits.

What I do have a problem with however, is when people call Larry Klayman a "bottom-feeding lawyer", a "shyster", or when people falsely allege that Judicial Watch is a corrupt, criminal enterprise. By alleging this, these people are essentially calling the diligent staff at Judicial Watch corrupt persons also. I have a problem with because it is not debate, it is personal attacks and needless mud-slinging.

[Howlin]

I see; so if you want to do it, it's okay; but if we join in a thread on Klayman, somebody YOU like and we don't, it's a personal attack?

How fair of you.

[Howlin]

And since you're here, I'll ask you this: why did Larry get all upset when the Bushes went to coffee with the CROOKS the Clintons, but it was fine and dandy for him to hang around and have his picture taken with Ashcroft -- Larry feels the same way about Ashcroft as he does about the Clintons, for goodness sakes.

Why is THAT okay, too?

[terilyn]

Larry is great, "I am sure".

All the people at Judicial Watch are great, "I am sure", is not debate either.

You are doing exactly what you accuse the "Bush-bots" of doing. Blindly trusting and following because you "are sure" you can trust your judgement.

How is how you debate re LK/JW debating, and when somebody else does it they are blindly accepting/trusting GWB?

I'm failing to see the difference here yet you apparantly think there is one.

[Texasforever]

"bottom-feeding lawyer", a "shyster",

Would it be better to use the scientific Latin name for his genus?

[Deb]

What ever happened to that guy with the Elian memo?

And what happened to the recount Larry did in Florida? Did he ever issue a final report?

What did he do with all the volumes and volumes of Clinton era depositions?

Why do you demand that Laura Bush make policy statements? Do you miss Hillary?

Why should she be investigated for "being pro-choice"?

Did you answer why Larry refuses to launch investigations against any Democrats?

What are you doing back here after being banned? Deceitful, ain't you?