[Howlin]

If you guys would stop your personal attacks on Larry Klayman and JW, we wouldn't have so much of a problem with you.

Actually, there wouldn't be a problem at all if you would ever acknowledge that saying Klayman spends less than 3 million on legal fees out of almost 24 million he took in is NOT a personal attack. It's a fact.

If your "business" is lawsuits, and you ask people for money so you can continue your business, it might be a good idea if you actually spent that money on the "business." The fact that you don't see what is wrong with that just shows that you can rationalize anything anything Klayman does.

[Fred Mertz]

Actually, there wouldn't be a problem at all if you would ever acknowledge that saying Klayman spends less than 3 million on legal fees out of almost 24 million he took in is NOT a personal attack. It's a fact.

Then why does he only pay himself $250k per year?

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"Actually, there wouldn't be a problem at all if you would ever acknowledge that saying Klayman spends less than 3 million on legal fees out of almost 24 million he took in is NOT a personal attack. It's a fact."

I have never considered those who legitimately asked questions of JW's budget, to be personal attacks. I think that you are well aware of which posts on this thread I consider to be personal attacks. The non-sensical pictures, name-calling, and snide remarks, are what I consider to be personal attacks against Larry Klayman's person and the diligent staff at Judicial Watch.