Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Miss Marple; FreedominJesusChrist; All
I've seen people say things like, "We're human beings, not animals." Of course, we are animals, but we're not just animals. We're primates, but I don't see why you can't use the term the same way, in that we aren't merely primates.
832 posted on 07/02/2002 12:35:22 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 823 | View Replies ]


To: A.J.Armitage
I only posted the definition because there seemed to be some confusion earlier in the thread. Your usage would be correct, but we are, of course, primates.
833 posted on 07/02/2002 12:38:16 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 832 | View Replies ]

To: A.J.Armitage; Miss Marple
Most Bible believing Christians would reject that definition of primates anyway. The problem with this definition is that it assumes that human beings are animals and thus, places them in the same category of apes and monkeys.

Defining humanity as being animals takes away from what ultimately sets us apart from the animal kingdom--human beings have a soul and are capable of belief in God and knowing right from wrong; God did not give this ability to animals and placed man over the animal kingdom because we are made in God's image and animals aren't.

Anyway, thanks for the extra information MM.

838 posted on 07/02/2002 1:31:18 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 832 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson