This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Skip to comments.
Walk Into the Office Of Judicial Watch...
The National Journal ^
| June 29, 2002
| Louis Jacobson
Posted on 07/01/2002 5:27:45 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,261-1,272 next last
To: VA Advogado
I believe that Larry was drinking that water himself, not fetching it for Mr. Ashcroft, whom I still do respect.
To: VA Advogado
And after this LONG article, we STILL see no numbers of wins and losses.
62
posted on
07/01/2002 6:25:15 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Miss Marple
This means he went to work under Carter.<OH please if you are going to Las vegas remind Bill Lind he worked for Gary Hart while your there. My point is you'll have to look hard to find a better political and historical mind than Lind. Lind BTW is a scheduled speaker for the FR convention.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
He is a hypocrite and so are you for whining about the pictures on this thread. They are simply pictures of Klayman doing "his thing."
They aren't altered; they are simply pictures of Larry trying to be one of the big boys.
64
posted on
07/01/2002 6:26:44 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Miss Marple
Nice catch. Another untruth on Larry's part. I guess it all gets so confusing after awhile.
65
posted on
07/01/2002 6:27:33 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
This article was deeper than wins and losses and ecompassed much more than that. Justice is not a sports game and cannot be measured in wins and losses. Sometimes Western thinking is too linear.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Hi Freedom
thank you for your friendly post
I like Larry a lot
I don't agree with everything he's done
I think he is very brave
I think Larry is honest
I wish him the best
Love, Palo
To: Clara Lou
I'm laughing here.
68
posted on
07/01/2002 6:28:39 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Justice is not a sports game and cannot be measured in wins and losses. Well, it's a damn good thing, isn't it?
Other stuff that was missing in this piece was the amount of money Larry actually spends on LEGAL COST, under 2,000,000 a year. Shocking.
69
posted on
07/01/2002 6:30:00 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: cva66snipe
Ah, during those years he was claiming to be a CONSERVATIVE.
Now he's claiming to be non-partisan.
WHERE ARE THE STORIES ABOUT CORRUPTION IN THE DEMOCRATS???????
70
posted on
07/01/2002 6:31:39 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Like I stated before, I believe that people on this forum are better in their critical thinking skills than apes, chimpanzees, and monkeys are.
If primates are pros at communicating to humans through the usage of computer symbols and pictures (Jane Goodall's Studies), then human beings, who were blessed by God to be able to speak because we have the vocal capability and our language is arbitrary, should be able to utilize these human capabilities to the fullest of extent. We are more intelligent than primates HOWLIN, let's show it.
To: AmericanInTokyo
Did you realize you posted an article today from a socialist-leftist source in Alabama (the SPLC) opposing efforts to control illegal immigration. (and you supported their contention and slurs?) but then you abandoned your post and article right afterward and never showed up again after nearly 90 posts by Freepers challening you to respond and support your posted story? What gives? Where did you go? Why did you do that today?
Um, because I had to go to work and don't spend all day playing on a computer? I did read the thread when I got home. Didn't see you refute anything in the article sweetie. :)
To: cva66snipe
I have no qualms about pointing out an obvious misrepresentation that has been trumpeted for several years by Klayman. It is quite possible that he was a career employee and not a political appointee. HOWEVER, he has consistently said that he worked under Reagan, and has never mentioned Carter. I think that is a bit misleading, myself.
And I don't care if he clerked under Bork himself, Klayman is not someone I would give a nickel to, after that "Tea and Mussolini" hit piece on Laura Bush. It was uncalled for, especially because at that time none of FIJC's "objections" to Laura Bush had even occurred. (Unless Larry is psychic as well.)
To: Howlin
Nice catch. It means nothing. You wanna tell Jim Rob he has a former Dem worker scheduled as a speaker in LV? His name is Bill Lind and he worked for Gary Hart. Good grief even Reagan used to be a Democrat. The Carter attack was shallow and fruitless.
To: Howlin
I love the pic of
LK peeking during the interview of John McSomething _or_another........
It's Larry at his very best.
Comment #76 Removed by Moderator
To: FreedominJesusChrist
And exactly what compromises are you talking about Sink? If you know what you are talking about at all? Schippers has been floating in the ether since the impeachment proceedings. He wrote a book (which got no traction), then he linked up with Klayman in lawsuits which snidely imply that the Bush administration was directly informed that the Sept. 11 attack would occur, with dates and locations.
Now, he's opening a Chicago office. You think he'll go after young Mayor Daley or the other corrupt Democrat politicians in Illinois?
Nah. He'll do like Russ Verney is doing in Dallas. Sit on his fat ass and pore over donor lists to various causes, figuring out how to milk the emotional retards who actually read and believe direct mail pieces.
The only principle these shysters believe is that you, and others like you, can be had.
77
posted on
07/01/2002 6:32:49 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: Howlin
Hmmm...ever heard of Loral?
To: Miss Marple
"Right up there in that article in black and white is the date 1979. This means he went to work under Carter.""he served from 1979 to 1981 as an attorney in the Justice Department's Antitrust Division,"
OMG! Don't tell me that he was a Carter civil service appointee. Which, in fact would have had him "serving under the Reagan DOJ," but NOT appointed by Reagan........
To: cva66snipe
I didn't know Lind tried to hide where he worked, did he?
Until this article, Klayman has claimed to have worekd in the Reagan administration.
Which story is NOT true.
80
posted on
07/01/2002 6:33:50 PM PDT
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,261-1,272 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson