Replies

I mean, let's be honest. Actions speak louder than words, and your actions tell me that "Intelligent Design" poses a serious threat to the monopoly that natural Evolution has in the public sphere. Furthermore, you lack confidence in your natural Evolution, you lack confidence in your own science, and fear that an open debate in a public forum would not win your side any points.

Such BS, scientific theory is not a destination it is a journey, the question is never really answered, discoveries and advancements simply spur better questions. ID is an attempt to hijack this process and interject god into all the current unknowns, thus effectively shutting down all future research. The real fear is that America would loose its technological edge and its ability to remain on the cutting edge. I mean really lets be honest.

Can you explain specifically how ID attempts to "inject God" into "science"? I expect you to make specific references to Dembski's work, quotes of his statements, etc. in order to make your case. I'll look forward to reading an explaination for this oft made remark.

I also would like you to explain, specifically, how Intelligent Design would hinder people from studying evolutionary theory, natural or otherwise. Also, explain how specifically a desire to acquire more technological information would be harmed. Thanks.