[That Subliminal Kid]

Hey there Patrick. Can you tell me specifically which part of ID theory deals with the actual designer? I'm anxious to see you quote Dembski or his colleagues where they discuss let alone mention the designer in any specific way. They don't. Which is why your contention, though oft repeated, is bunk. You know it too. If I'm wrong, you'll entertain us all by embarrasing me and proving with references why I am wrong. Good luck.

[PatrickHenry]

Hey there Patrick. Can you tell me specifically which part of ID theory deals with the actual designer?

The doctrine of "Intelligent Design" absolutely reeks with the implication of a designer. Are you seriously suggesting that ID means no designer? If so, welcome to the evolution side of the debate.