Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phaedrus
Vaclav Havel had entertained this question of practicality in the face of systemic corruption. His response: live in the truth.
15 posted on 07/01/2002 7:38:55 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: cornelis
Vaclav Havel had entertained this question of practicality in the face of systemic corruption. His response: live in the truth.

And I agree. I also agree with Solzhenitsyn. Specific laws and specific judges have, however, earned our contempt. We should not hesitate to show it. If hypocrisy and dishonesty are allowed to stand as law, the very revolution so feared by Keyes will become inevitable. I didn't at all miss his message, you see. But it is now not enough to "tolerate" the continuing erosion of our moral capital -- tolerance in truth being ennui or sloth or calculation. JimRob thinks (and I am interpreting here) that we can overcome by voting straight Republican, then weeding the miscreants. He may be right -- it may be the one effective nonviolent course of action, and I do not advocate violence. But the politicians have gamed the system to the point that votes are massively being bought and public service is a contradiction in terms. Means have been sacrificed to ends. If the takers can outvote the contributors, what then for the republic?

16 posted on 07/01/2002 9:13:50 AM PDT by Phaedrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson