[A.J.Armitage]

This is funny. You start by saying I have a reading comprehension problem, and then repeat several times that I trust the moderators, when it's obvious to anyone with a brain that I don't, and that my distrust and contempt for them was the whole point in the first place. Notice I called both that I lost and that I trust the moderators your assumptions and then contradicted both as soon as I stated them. This isn't rocket science.

At one point you say if I weren't losing, I wouldn't have resorted to "smear tactics and slander". In the same message, you say I have a "predilection" for torturing animals (otherwise, why else wouldn't I share in your emotionally over-wrought hysteria?), and imply I'm a Holocaust denier. Earlier, you implied rather strongly that FiJC in a pedophile. By your own standards (not mine, yours), you lost long ago.

Good bye, loser.

[FormerLurker]

This is funny. You start by saying I have a reading comprehension problem, and then repeat several times that I trust the moderators, when it's obvious to anyone with a brain that I don't, and that my distrust and contempt for them was the whole point in the first place.

Ok, so I did in fact misread that one segment. In any case, I find calling the moderator for help to be a desperate act of cowardice in a vain attempt to silence one who you had just called a "tree-hugging klansman".

Notice I called both that I lost and that I trust the moderators your assumptions and then contradicted both as soon as I stated them. This isn't rocket science.

As your writing skills are a bit deficient here, I can safely assume that you are indeed not a rocket scientist.

At one point you say if I weren't losing, I wouldn't have resorted to "smear tactics and slander". In the same message, you say I have a "predilection" for torturing animals (otherwise, why else wouldn't I share in your emotionally over-wrought hysteria?), and imply I'm a Holocaust denier.

You started with your smears well before I accused you of promoting animal torture. Why would you protect such atrocious actions if you didn't have such a predilection? One does not advocate or seek to promote something that one does not support.

As for the reference to the Holocaust, do you deny that those who portray the Holocaust as a lie use tactics that include those that you have yourself utilized?

Earlier, you implied rather strongly that FiJC in a pedophile. By your own standards (not mine, yours), you lost long ago.

FiJC kept insisting that the reason they eat dog is because of the "starving children" who have no other means of partaking in a protein rich diet. That is pure BS, as the primary reason they eat dog is for its perceived benefit as an aphrodisiac. In fact, it is more expensive than pork and chicken, both of which are plentiful in South Korea.

So I did wonder why FiJC would want to feed dog to the "starving children", when it is generally only ingested for the purpose of making one more virile.

Good bye, loser.

Adios numnuts.