Actually you dont have to be that nervus. "Mistreatment" (in the eyes of westeners) of dogs are common all over Asia. During the cultural revolution 1,500 million highschool graduates (Red Guards) were sent to countryside by Mao for reeducation in China. One of the ways for them to kill time was to steal the dogs of the local peasants to make delicious dishes. They brought a female dog to attract male dogs and let them mate. In the middle of the process they literally cut off the dog's penis and let it bleed to death. Others might simply beat the dog to death because the dog could get his organ out in order to escape.
I admit there is some backwards part in the Asian culture, but things are changing. Anyway, they beat dogs not because they like to see dogs suffering but because they don't think it's wrong. Asian people are not cruel people. The are tender-hearted, compared with westeners.
Anyway, they beat dogs not because they like to see dogs suffering but because they don't think it's wrong. Asian people are not cruel people. The are tender-hearted, compared with westeners.
Anybody who could do what you describe is far from being "tender-hearted". One does not need to be indoctrinated by "religion" to understand basic concepts of right and wrong. To cause a living creature such horrible anguish is obscene. But, to inflict such agony on a creature that befriends man, who understands human commands, and who lavishes man with love and affection, is uncomprehensibly sinister. This ruthless act of cruelty could not come from a person with a "tender-heart", but from one whose blood runs cold through his veins like a lizard.
I'm sure MANY former POWs would also have a word to say about the "tenderness" of their Asian captors hearts.
We're supposed to believe this in spite of an insurmountable body of evidence to the contrary? Ha, ha, ha.
That was your joke for the day.
What people invented the suicide bomber and chillingly referred to them as a 'divine wind'? Hmmm?