Your response to post #379 was a bit more indicative of someone who was espousing the view that anyone concerned about this was a "envirowacky animals rights" type person, as evidenced in post #380.
I find it interesting that now you claim you were simply pointing out that these people don't want to eat our dogs.
I must congratulate you, however. I don't doubt you've found the pretext the hypocritical frauds with their fingers on the ban buttons will use.
You're the one that summoned the moderator. I myself would have walked away, but you couldn't leave things as they were. I have no interest in seeing you banned, nor have I hit the "Abuse" button on you. I simply don't like being portrayed as a cross between a "klansman and a tree-hugger", and I told you so in so many words.