Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
You're all missing the real point of any possible attack - it is the same point as 911 - economics. They want to bring down our monetary system more than anything in order to demoralize us. They assume that if the financial markets crash and our fiat money loses all of its' value that massive civil disobedience will take place, giving them cover to use explosives and overt action to destroy additional key facilities. Kick us when we're down, so to speak.

As before, they have seriously underestimated our character. The 'civil disobedience' that they would hope for would instead be directed at all of the Muslims here in the US - effectively removing that cult from our shores, and hopefully from the face of the Earth eventually.

26 posted on 06/28/2002 5:56:25 PM PDT by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: 11B3
I agree, that is why the government, is not informing us about the true causes of 800, 589, and OKC. More tin foil please, (does tin foil stop radiation?).. Tounge in cheek on the tin foil. Tom
36 posted on 06/28/2002 6:22:14 PM PDT by tall_tex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: 11B3
You're all missing the real point of any possible attack - it is the same point as 911 - economics. They want to bring down our monetary system more than anything in order to demoralize us. They assume that if the financial markets crash and our fiat money loses all of its' value that massive civil disobedience will take place, giving them cover to use explosives and overt action to destroy additional key facilities. Kick us when we're down, so to speak.

A really ignorant strategy. Bin Laden should invest in a few US History and economics texts...

37 posted on 06/28/2002 6:27:52 PM PDT by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: 11B3
I have wondered why there wasn't some sort of follow up attack immediately after 9/11, maybe a day or so later. We were taken off guard and they could have nailed us big time with a series of attacks. But there has been nothing since. Why? Is there a much larger attack in the plans or was 9/11 the best they could do? I almost think we've seen the best they can do.
119 posted on 06/28/2002 9:55:02 PM PDT by weef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: 11B3
You're all missing the real point of any possible attack - it is the same point as 911 - economics. They want to bring down our monetary system more than anything in order to demoralize us. They assume that if the financial markets crash and our fiat money loses all of its' value that massive civil disobedience will take place, giving them cover to use explosives and overt action to destroy additional key facilities. Kick us when we're down, so to speak.

Roger that sergeant. I agree with you one hundred percent. The question is, who are they? Are they middle eastern terrorists? The terrorist organizations involved with the "axis of evil" countries have never shown themselves to be interested in destabilizing countries (with the exception of DPRK operatives in the ROK, but they are't terrorists). They have always been inclined to terrorize the populace. That, of course, doesn't mean they couldn't change their method of operation. They could have evolved.

However, there is another possibility. It has always been the MO of the communist party to destabilize a countries economy to set the stage for "revolution". The PRC generals in the PLA have already stated that war with America is inevitable. China Reveals Nuclear War Plans Against U.S., China Eyes War vs. No. 1 Enemy, PLA weekly outlines war options with U.S., China backs the euro at dollar's expense

We also know that both the Russians and Chinese are providing weapons, technology and money to the "axis of evil" countries. CIA Report Blames China, Russia for Massive Weapons Proliferation, China providing advanced aid in long-range missiles to Iran, Syria, China helping Russia with Iranian missiles, China continues nuke cooperation with Iran, U.S. failed to stop Chinese technical aid to Iraq, U.S. Says China, Russia, Cuba, Syria, Libya Abet Terrorism

Call me paranoid, but I think there is more going on than appears. There is a reason China and Russia are arming the middle east. There is a reason they are working together and with Cuba to destabilize Latin America. There is a reason China has taken control over the Panama canal, and is presently in talks with Bermuda to buid the largest port facility in the world.

The terrorists may be doing the dirty work, but they are being funded by Russia and China directly and via the axis of evil countries who in turn are funded by Russia and China. The end purpose being to economically destabilze the U.S. Economy. So the question is why.

It is highly unlikely they believe they can destabilize the economy and America will open her arms to communism/marxism/socialism. Americans are not Latin American peasants. However, there probably would be some chaos in the US if the economy was destablized bad enough. Such chaos may prevent any swift miltary action on our part, which would be a perfect opportunity for China to attack Taiwan, the DPRK to attack the ROK, and for the various middle eastern states to attack Israel.

Whether the above scenario is just the loony ramblings of an ex-grunt remain to be seen, but the question should be asked; why do the Russians and Chinese continue to do the things they are doing? What do they expect to gain by continuing to fund terrorist organizations and axis of evil nations? I would suggest that our national security may very well depend on whether that question is addressed by the Bush administration.

RLTW!

Semper Suo

158 posted on 06/29/2002 4:32:01 PM PDT by bat-boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson