The way to prevent it is to have inspectors and an informed citizenship."[Said Pedro Rodriguez]
So, exactly what would the inspectors inspect if no I.D. is required? Is Mr. Rodriguez naive enough to think that the reason citizens vote more than once is because they don’t know it is wrong? Or maybe he just thinks we’re dumb enough to believe that is the case.
Republicans said the bill represented a non-partisan effort to wipe out fraud.[ said Steve Miskin]
Come on Miskin, you’re sounding as bad as Rodriguez. If the vote was split down party lines, then quite obviously it isn’t “non-partisan”. The Democrats have long come to rely on bolstering their power by vote fraud, changing… well, enforcing the rules late in the game will seem like a blow below the belt to those who can’t think rationally.
This shows Mike Fisher can't win on a fair vote. said Rep. Mark Cohen
Actually, what it shows is that Republicans believe that Mike Fisher CAN win on a fair vote.
It’s simply laughable that the dems believe that the electorate of PA would think that this measure is some type of ploy to keep loveable old minorities struggling to reach the polling stations in their walkers from casting a ballot. Well, actually, almost no one challenged the fact that we had a 98.6 turn out in the 2000 election in Philadelphia. Maybe they’re not that stupid after all…
Owl_Eagle
”Guns Before Butter.”
FWIW, I just voted yesterday by absentee ballot. It was the last day to get one in person at the courthouse. I filled out my request form, turned it in and was handed my absentee ballot. The gentleman asked me to fill it out, enclose it in the envelope and turn it back in where he date stamped it. Never once did he ask for and ID. Go figure.