Dodge City - Unanswered questions about the Oklahoma bombing
By Jim Crogan LA Weekly
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/laweekly/20020703/lo/36265_1.html
Davis obtained the confidential warnings from Yossef Bodansky, the executive director of the House Republican task force. "I got this material in late May of 1996," Davis says. Bodansky gave her permission to use the alerts in her reports. But then he called back and asked Davis not to air them. "He said the issue had gotten too hot, and no one wanted to deal with it. So I honored his request" at the time, she says. The warnings were never publicized.
Davis told me in 1996 that she kept the details of the official warning notice from attorney Jones who she said knew she had the details and wanted her subpoenaed. A conference was held in Judge Matsch chambers when Jones tried unsuccessfully to have Jayna Davis subpoenaed.
Davis knew the details of the memo when she had her prepared statement read outside of the OKC County Grand Jury stating that the government did not have sufficient warning to stop the Murrah bombing. Yet her prepared statement never revealed the prior warning notice and I wonder if the grand jury was ever told by Davis about it..
The prior warning notice from Bodansky with the Murrah building listed as a target does provide a basis along with other evidence to believe that the government may have been able to stop the Murrah bombing. But as important is the fact that the government did use the notice to forewarn the FBI, Federal Judges and US Marshals and the BATF before the bombing but did not warn the people who were killed in the day care center and in the Social Security office.
To me the government as a minimum is guilty of criminal negligence in this case since they warned Federal officials but not citizens in the Murrah building. Davis knew from me Charles Key and William Jasper that this was an issue before she testified before the OK County grand jury.
I personally find what Davis did to withhold this information for so many years when many urged her to release it as morally distasteful and indefensible. I hope she asks God and the citizens of Oklahoma and America for forgiveness for withholding the details of the memo.
In my opinion Davis is using Jim Crogan in the above article reference to come up with an alibi to hide behind Bodansky, Bodansky should have revealed details of the memo years ago, but so should have Davis in my opinion. Davis told me on several occasions she had working FOR a government official sometime between 1996 to mid 1997. and she repeated she was still working for the same official well into 1999. IF this official was Bodansky then maybe it would explain why Davis was reluctant to reveal the details of the memo and risk possible employment or income.
And I take note of the fact that this alibi was written by Crogan for Davis after I publicly revealed these details and criticized her on this very thread almost five day before Crogans article came out. My guess is that Crogan really has not been told the complete story by Davis otherwise he may have written his story differently.