[honway]

The witnesses want to cooperate with the grand jury, but not before they are guaranteed police protection, Davis said. They also want prosecutors "to express a legitimate interest" in pursuing indictments against the suspects they can identify, she said.

We cannot affirmatively state that absolutely no one else was involved in the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. However we have not been presented with or uncovered information sufficient to indict any additional conspirators

I guess the fix was in before it started. How could they indict without hearing the eye witnesses that saw the additional conspirators. Amazing.

[Fred Mertz]

"She [Jayna Davis] also wants to make it perfectly clear that after her two-year exhaustive investigation, she has turned up no credible evidence that supports the theory that the federal government had sufficient prior warnings to prevent the bombing," McCoy said.

Her attorney selected his words carefully. He could have said, "We have some evidence of prior warnings but not adequate enough to prevent the bombing." He chose the spin which put his client in the best light IMHO.

Those two words are also in your reply #63 (sufficient & credible).

I agree with your assessment in #64 too honway.