Skip to comments.
Trial will weigh whether Muslim must remove veil for license photo
AZCentral.com/Orlando Sentinel ^
| 6.26.02
Posted on 06/27/2002 10:46:08 AM PDT by mhking
Edited on 05/07/2004 5:20:58 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-167 next last
To: Pearls Before Swine
Leave the country and go ride a camel.......
81
posted on
06/27/2002 4:57:10 PM PDT
by
geege
To: mhking
Let the Bitch walk!
82
posted on
06/27/2002 5:05:16 PM PDT
by
BnBlFlag
To: mhking
If she is willing to relax her religious convictions to be able to drive, she can just as well "uncover" for a picture too.
No, this is more a propoganda attempt to make the point that our system of laws are stupid and inferior to the Islamic "sharia".
It's a perverse attempt to ridicule our system of individual freedoms and liberty.
83
posted on
06/27/2002 7:18:11 PM PDT
by
mikeIII
To: mhking
Howard Marks, Freeman's lawyer, argues that her
religious freedom,
Wrong.
freedom of speech,
Wrong.
equal protection,
Wrong.
right to privacy
Wrong.
and due process were violated by the state's cancellation of her license last December.
And wrong.
The issuance of a driver's license by any state is a privelege...not a right and can be revoked.
To: JMJ333
I heard that too. Simple answer. You don't take veil off, you don't get driver's license. Comprende?
To: contessa machiaveli
exactly! Now will someone start a petition for this one too? Please, this is insanity. I saw on the news she had a license from Illinois I think with her veil on. She gets no license in my opinion and we need her fingerprints for future reference.
I guess it's OK for Batman to get his license...
87
posted on
06/27/2002 7:43:50 PM PDT
by
mhking
To: mhking
Muslims are programmed to press all limits. They know exactly what they are dealing with and what they want to do. Don't be fooled.
Whatever promotes their takeover, they will sue, lie, cheat, steal, kill, bomb, whatever to gain any advantage.
To: rudypoot
We should all wear ski masks! See how that goes over! LOL!
To: summer
bump.
To: Dec31,1999
So if I wear a mask like this, they can't say anything...
91
posted on
06/27/2002 8:09:11 PM PDT
by
mhking
To: Jay W
Maybe, but i am sure every loser criminal type will be converting to Islam so they can wear a veil too!
To: Freebird Forever; Grut
The Amish have been assembling peaceably for years without driving motor vehicles. LOL!
You nailed it brother.
'nuff said.
93
posted on
06/27/2002 11:03:01 PM PDT
by
ppaul
To: PoisedWoman
She has NO peripheral vision Yeah, but maybe that's why the ACLU chose Florida for a test case. Half the drivers are already blind, or so senile that they inadvertently voted for Pat Buchanan. (The other half seem to be crazed immigrants driving rusty Hondas with oversized exhaust pipes, at breakneck [often literally] speed).
I mean, by driving blindfolded this item of some man's property (as Islam views a woman) is only levelling the playing field...
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
To: mhking
Batman Ah, but he's a law enforcement officer. Exempt from the laws we peons endure.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
To: mhking
Her lawyer has brought up the fact that identification could be done by fingerprints or DNA. Ok I can agree with that on the following condition. She is held in custody as an unidentifiable person until her identity can be confirmed by the fingerprints or the DNA.
Just my 2c worth
96
posted on
06/28/2002 6:36:28 AM PDT
by
SledgeCS
To: mhking
Is that you? ;)
To: Dec31,1999
Is that you?Nope - haven't done my Klingon uniform yet...[g]
98
posted on
06/28/2002 9:28:43 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: borntodiefree
If you completely own something (have allodial title), then shouldn't you be able to buy and sell...whatever it is...without government intervention? I've only read up to #68, but does that mean that the state owns all real estate as well? Is this why the state can "confiscate" homes and vehicles of drug dealers and drunk drivers, etc, because it owns them in the first place?
Is that what "eminant domain" is about? Thanks for the interesting info.
To: Dec31,1999
Lawfully they do. Once you give them the DEED, and you receive the "Certificate of Title" on you property, you have given them the allodial title, and you have equity title.
First thing is just becuase it is "lawful", doesn't make it legal. The whole system for vehicles and property is based on "Torrens system" and Marxism. Ultimately, it is based on deception and fraud makeing the ones operating the deception criminals.
Finally, by "common law", if you have the equity title, you are supposed to be able to take the proof of 100% equity title to the allodial title holder and recieve the allodial title. However, the state illegally destroys the Manufacturers Certificate of Origin (for vehicles) after they are microphished. Therefore they destroy the "allodial title" in violation of law.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-167 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson