I still contend that they can't prove that this was the motive. There was no evidence of sexual assault on Danielle. He can't prove motive; he hasn't shown opportunity; and he hasn't shown/proven a laundry list of items.
I guess I just need more proof than most people.
Is that why they did the dual portrayal as the guy who was looking to hook up with VD's/Barb, etc...the adult party references....and then try to portray him as a pedophile also....in case that failed, they could switch the motive to rejection/revenge?
I need more proof also.