Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
Hard to believe that a little "ditty" written by a Socialist, which didn't mention "God" for it's first 62 years, is causing so much consternation.

Under the First Amendment, anyone is free to exercise practically any religious belief they choose; they may not use the power of Government to impose it on anyone else. What's so complicated about the concept??

37 posted on 06/27/2002 12:20:03 AM PDT by UncleJeff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: UncleJeff
Under the First Amendment, anyone is free to exercise practically any religious belief they choose; they may not use the power of Government to impose it on anyone else. What's so complicated about the concept??

Because this court just codified a state religion. Atheism.

39 posted on 06/27/2002 12:23:30 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: UncleJeff
And a voluntary pledge is forcing beliefs on someone how, exactly?
52 posted on 06/27/2002 12:37:59 AM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: UncleJeff
"One nation under God" keeps the Pledge of Allegiance from establishing a state religion, ala the Soviet Union. Recognition of God is not a religion. Atheism is not a religion. No religion is threatened by including "under God." All are threatened when a nation allows itself to be Supreme.
If you pledge to a godless nation you pledge to a nation that has usurped God's place in your heart.
The Ninth Circuit Court is WRONG.
223 posted on 06/27/2002 4:00:33 AM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson