Larry Klayman and all the employees at Judicial Watch are intelligent and principled people, I am sure.
I personally have no problem with his foreign policy standpoint on the Middle East dilemma as of now. He has never claimed to be a foreign policy expert, he was INVITED onto to that show as guest to comment on FOREIGN POLICY. In otherwords, he did not invite himself. I personally do not support any kind of Palestinian state, especially as of now. I believe that there must be certain pre-existing conditions in order for democracy to be a viable option in any nation, and the Palestinians do not have any of these prerequisites as of now. The reason President Bush had to blatantly state "no Arafat" to the Palestinians is probably because they would have re-elected him anyway, had they the chance and choice.
By the way, are you still downplaying the role that traditional organized crime plays with unions?
You're bringing an argument from another thread over to this one. Totally bad form.
Of course, there really is nothing to say to defend this, is there? I haven't read the rest of the thread, but I'm sure you will come up with some doozies.
You can start with telling us all exactly WHEN AND WHERE Larry Klayman became an expert in foreign policy and/or terrorism?