[Luis Gonzalez]

"I was never aware that he was actually referred to as a foreign policy expert on the Middle East, rather he is usually referred to as the Chairman and General Counsel of Judicial Watch, which is most likely what he was introduced as."

Below is Larry's stated mission for Judicial Watch, you say that he was probably introduced as Chairman and General Counsel of Judicial Watch.

 Mission

Judicial Watch, Inc. was established in 1994 to serve as an ethical and legal "watchdog" over our government, legal, and judicial systems to promote a return to ethics and morality in our nation's public life.

As a non-partisan, non-profit foundation based in Washington, D.C., and with offices throughout the country, Judicial Watch relies on supporters, like yourself, to help us root out corruption in our government and to make sure offenders are brought to justice.

~~~~~~~

If Larry was there in his role as Chairman and General Counsel for Judicial Watch, what were the ethical or legal issues he was addresing concerning this?

If you browse through JW's press releases, there seems to be a veritable vacuum of articles critical of the Democratic Party, I didn't see a single one, maybe I needed to dig further back in the archives. This in light of the blockade of the Bush administration's Judicial nominees, Judges that would theoretically, improve Larry's chances of making headway in the courts, with his many cases that he claims are being stonewalled by Clinton-appointed Judges.

Yet JW's silence on this issue is deafening.

Why?

[FreedominJesusChrist]

As a strong vocal supporter of Judicial Watch and its chairman, Larry Klayman, I would personally like to say that I just LOVE Larry Klayman's current events columns. Klayman and others working for JW have been writing current events columns for years and I appreciate this fact.

Evidently, the majority of JW supporters don't seem to mind either.