Skip to comments.
Bush Criticizes 9th Circuit Court Decision
Sean Hannity radio show ^
| 6/26/02
| Pyro7480
Posted on 06/26/2002 1:57:40 PM PDT by Pyro7480
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-148 next last
To: Joe Brower
When has atheism ever declared a "holy war" on you?
I do not believe in any god.
I am not trying to kill you.
To: RAT Patrol
Do you really believe you are serving Bush well by bashing people who voted for him in 2000? #1, I don't beleive that many on here who flagellate themselves over the "daily betrayals" voted for him. That's my opinion and I am entitled to it. Criticism should sharpen him. It's better than accolades many times.
Maybe constructive criticism, but not the daily dose of knee jerk ill-informed criticism from many people who seem to get some sort of pervertred joy of posting "NWO, Bildaberger, Jorge" as every other word.
There is a difference.
102
posted on
06/26/2002 3:48:44 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: Betty Jo
Why am I not surprised YOU are in agreement with this ruling.
103
posted on
06/26/2002 3:49:44 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: TomGuy; OKCSubmariner; rdavis84; aristeides; Fred Mertz
Does anyone else think it funny that "God" didnt have anything to say to Ike before Ike did his thingy?
Comment #105 Removed by Moderator
To: Dane
I agree with you but you also should allow people some room to vent. I put my heart and soul into supporting Bush, but not for him, for the conservative cause. He broke my heart with the CFR signing. I'll still support him when I have to and certainly I'll support him against liberals, but he will never have my full trust again. I'm still in it for the conservative cause. So is Sabertooth.
To: Sabertooth
You've violated the FR posting guidelines, and I hope he doesn't hit the abuse button, as I won't. I'd like this little spew of yours to remain on display. Oh really? You have me on your "ping" list in which I never asked to be on for every Hispanic bashing thread you find.
Just following your lead Sabertooth.
BTW, I just ignore them, but I follow your tactics and all the sudden you are going to press the abuse button. Can someone say hypocrisy.
107
posted on
06/26/2002 3:52:59 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: Florie
Solely?
Get real!
To: RoseofTexas
77% on the online poll say they disagree.
109
posted on
06/26/2002 3:55:07 PM PDT
by
agrace
To: TomGuy
Yep, run to the cameras on this nonsense, but let 4,000 Americans die because of their corruptnes, and its no-show for them!
To: William Wallace
The answer to that is..take that hoaky jingo off our money!
Comment #112 Removed by Moderator
To: bunnypants
Hey, are you a fellow atheist freeper?
To: ex-snook
Give me a cite for one radical atheist killing someone becuse of atheism.
To: gore_sux
Do you really think that only a god can decide a right and a wrong?
To: Howlin
Because you are beginning ro understand me, Howlin!
You know that I dont need a god to know whats up!
To: RAT Patrol
but he will never have my full trust again JMO, but if you are looking for "full trust" in politics then you are bound to be diappointed. I am happy with 80% trust.
BTW, on CFR this is my theory for what it is worth.
Bush signed CFR to take a club away from the demorats, mccain, and the press. Yes the ad bans are vile, but I beleive that the ad bans will be overturned because of a recent SCOTUS decision in which SCOTUS overturned an Ohio town's ban on door to door solicitation which is hardly different from a politcal ad being on TV.
Sheesh if SCOTUS says that banning door to door solicitation is unconstitutional, I think that they would really look stupid if they upheld the ban on TV political ads when the person can just turn the TV off, which is a lot easier than not answering the doorbell.
117
posted on
06/26/2002 4:13:37 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: Dane
I hope you're right about the SCOTUS. I cannot imagine it will go otherwise, but they are a funny bunch.
To: RAT Patrol
I haven't been following this thread, but I would say that now that the Democrats in the Senate have moved so swiftly to establish their "bona fides" in the political spectrum and come out so strongly against the actions of the judges in this decision, the Republicans should hold their feet to the fire and "smoke them out" by moving in the congress for impeachment of these judges and then watch the true sentiments of the Democrats surface as they begin their dance.
To: Betty Jo
You need something. Try God; it couldn't hurt.
120
posted on
06/26/2002 4:22:47 PM PDT
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-148 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson