Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rth_sr
I am pretty sure that this was referring to the Pledge of Alligance and not the U.S. Constitution. Either way, those judges need to be replaced.
3 posted on 06/26/2002 1:40:22 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FreedominJesusChrist
The Age of Clinton.
4 posted on 06/26/2002 1:41:35 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
My posting was intended as sarcasm. I realize today's ruling was about the Pledge. Just demonstrating "slippery slope."
6 posted on 06/26/2002 1:42:27 PM PDT by rth_sr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
I am pretty sure that this was referring to the Pledge of Alligance and not the U.S. Constitution. Either way, those judges need to be replaced.

I beleive that he was being a little bit sarcastic, though the possibilities aren't that far-fetched given what these liberal judges did today.

7 posted on 06/26/2002 1:42:55 PM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson