Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
So how did that refute what I said?

And freedom of religion is a right specifically mentioned in our Constitution, a right "incorporated" by the US Supreme Court, and not in any way unalienable, as seen throughout history, as even seen in our country.

Government has chosen to endorse religion in this case. The Courts have struck them down. Sorry that you don't like it, but it's only the things that are disliked that are protected by the Constitution. Popular speech and popular religions don't need protecting--just the unpopular things.
806 posted on 06/26/2002 1:39:17 PM PDT by Viva Le Dissention
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies ]


To: Viva Le Dissention
So how did that refute what I said?

Rather thoroughly.

And freedom of religion is a right specifically mentioned in our Constitution, a right "incorporated" by the US Supreme Court, and not in any way unalienable, as seen throughout history, as even seen in our country.

What you're failing to grasp, inspite of what I posted to you earlier, is that the only rights we have are "unalienable." That's what distinguishes them from privileges. The Founders understood this, you don't.

Rights come from God, priveleges come from government. Privleges can be revoked by government, rights cannot. Rights cannot be revoked, because we are endowed with them by our Creator.

The Founders held some truths to be self-evident. That the logical conclusions of those self-evident truths is not apparent to you, is apparent.




827 posted on 06/26/2002 1:45:34 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 806 | View Replies ]

To: Viva Le Dissention
And freedom of religion is a right specifically mentioned in our Constitution, a right "incorporated" by the US Supreme Court, and not in any way unalienable, as seen throughout history, as even seen in our country.

You are refuted by your own words.

Freedom of religion.

Not freedom from religion.

850 posted on 06/26/2002 1:50:12 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 806 | View Replies ]

To: Viva Le Dissention
Popular speech and popular religions don't need protecting--just the unpopular things.

What?! Religion doesn't need protection?! Would you call Christianity a "popular" religion these days! Certainly not to the 9th Circuit!

Consider this: You have rights because God gave them to you. If an understanding of God is taken out of public life, then your rights are left ot the whim of government. God gives rights...government protects them. That is all.

924 posted on 06/26/2002 2:04:18 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 806 | View Replies ]

To: Viva Le Dissention; rintense; Miss Marple; PhiKapMom
King Solomon(not Pres. George W. Bush or Sen. Tom Daschle) says--
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." -- Ecclesiastes 10:2
*******
All I ever really needed to know about politics and making 'wise' choices.
******
Viva Le Dissention, keeps the mind sharp.
951 posted on 06/26/2002 2:09:57 PM PDT by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 806 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson