To: WellsFargo94
>whatever happened to freedom of worship?
You have it. The problem is that you'd like to force your God upon others and they would like their freedom to avoid worship. Now you both have your rights.
641 posted on
06/26/2002 1:04:37 PM PDT by
DrCarl
To: DrCarl
Now you both have your rights.
You will need to explain this to the many people here who seem to think that this ruling implies that no one anywhere may ever utter the Pledge in any way shape or form lest they be violating some clause of the Constitution that only a truly deluded 1% of the population believes exists (and none of that 1% sits on any judicial panel).
To: DrCarl
Now you both have your rights.No, only one has rights, the one who wanted to establish athiesm as a religion. The rest of us have had our rights removed. The new religion of state is Athiest.
To: DrCarl
You have it. The problem is that you'd like to force your God upon others and they would like their freedom to avoid worship. Now you both have your rights."One Nation Under God" - Your "God" can be any diety you deem. There is no harm in the Pledge of Allegiance, it gives kids a time to reflect on the sacrifices that some have made defending your right to be an A$$hule. Furthermore this country was founded "under God" whether you like it or not.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson