[rwfromkansas]

There is cause for outrage because the court does not understand the meaning of th First Amendment. It does not support a separation of church and state.

[phasma proeliator]

You would be the "problem" not the solution. I refuse to waste any further energy on you.

[hellinahandcart]

There is cause for outrage because the court does not understand the meaning of th First Amendment. It does not support a separation of church and state.

Thank you. There is additional cause for outrage because the court obviously does not know the difference between simple English words like "establish", "endorse", and "acknowledge", either.

[Pistias]

It does not support a separation of church and state

ON the contrary, it does--just not the one tweaked with in the Lemon case.