Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Recovering_Democrat
Technically, wouldn't the court only have to strike down the 1956 addition of "under God" as unconstitutional, and not the whole Pledge?

Sounds like overreaching to me.

21 posted on 06/26/2002 11:30:21 AM PDT by cracker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cracker
Exactly. A tempest in a teapot. We recited - "one nation, indivisible", -- all through WWII, & Korea, and it served the purpose just fine.

Anyone know why it was changed?

63 posted on 06/26/2002 11:38:24 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: cracker
Technically, wouldn't the court only have to strike down the 1956 addition of "under God" as unconstitutional, and not the whole Pledge?
Exactly....and most public schools and public places I've heard of drop it anyway. IMO it never should have been added to begin with....it contradicts the Constitution.

-Eric

189 posted on 06/26/2002 11:58:28 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson