[Dimensio]

I have just as much right to say those two words as you do to not say them.

No one is arguing against such. The argument is over whether the government can endorse the implication of the existence of deities. Note that this is not the same as endorsing the nonexistence of deities -- there is a difference between saying "there are no gods" and not saying anything with respect to gods at all.

[Howlin]

The argument is over whether the government can endorse the implication of the existence of deities.

That has already been settled. The government can and does; if you don't think so, take a look at the change in your pocket.

I wish you all would quit trying to make this some sort of moral choice; it's not; this is about a SMALL group of people trying to take the word God off everything on earth. And your argument only aids and abets them.