Good to hear that. I'm fond of her as well. I beleive she handles the liberals quite well considering that they try to not let her finish a sentance.
But... She's not anywhere NEAR as good looking as the Free Republically Correct around here claim. Not to bash her but her body literally reminds me of Olive Oil. She's marginally good looking at best. Her face is fairly attractive but that body....Well....YUCK!!
Well, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, I guess. I once dated a girl that we nicknamed "Olive Oil" so that isn't necessarily a bad thing. I do think that I wouldn't throw Ann out of bed for eating crackers (as if that's going to happen). In fact, I'd probably encourage her to eat some crackers. :^)
And she's sometimes (Too much for my tastes) an embarrassment on television. She's a WONDERFUL read though.
Well, she is willing to go out on a limb, but I wouldn't call her an embarrassment. I think she shuts down the liberal news machine quite well. She does push their buttons nicely, wouldn't you think?
and as for NewsMax.com...The best thing I can say about them is that they are not as big of a joke as WorldNetDaily.com.
Newsmax is definately biased. I think that's pretty obvious. However, I don't think that their bias is any more outragous than other news outlets such as the New York Times. How many times have we heard about global warming, women's lower pay, and the like. This doesn't make what newsmax does absolutely correct, but its nice to read something (with a grain of salt, of course) that isn't pointed to the left. Gives them a taste of their own medicine.
For the record, IMHO right-wing tele-bimbo seems pretty accurate. I think half the time Ann is putting on whoever is talking with her - she gets that little crooked grin like she's the only one in on the joke; some of her conversations with Alan Colmes seem very much that way. I am looking forward to reading her book, though.