Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
"In fact, it doesn't matter if you or I agree with the decision at all. The Supreme Court's opinion is the only one that matters"

These statements show a complet disrespect for the founding principles of the American revolution and the Constitution. The people are to be the ultimate power in the government. The people are to guard and protect their rights against all tyrants be it Lincoln or the current judicial tyranny. Juries are to decide the law and the fact. They have the right and duty to interpret the law just as much as the supreme court. Furthermore, the union of States was originally an agreement entered into by free States and the States as parties to the contract are to ensure that the contract is followed. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS NOT TO BE THE FINAL ARBITER OF WHETHER ITS ACTIONS ARE LEGAL. When the federal government violates its contract, the constitution, the States are to stop the abuse by nullification and imposition, and if necessary, secession. This is what our founding fathers intended. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of Jefferson clearly show this. The very foundation of our government is based on the idea that "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

To say that the Supreme Court's opinion is the only one that matters is extremely shallow and an admission of judicial tyranny. If thats the form of government you want, continue to ascribe to it. As for me, in the immortal words of the Southern Statesman, Patrick Henry, "Give me Liberty, or give me Death."
126 posted on 06/26/2002 10:04:13 AM PDT by doryfunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: doryfunk
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS NOT TO BE THE FINAL ARBITER OF WHETHER ITS ACTIONS ARE LEGAL.

No that would be the Supreme Court, as per Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution. If you see rebellion as the preferred solution to solving issues arrising under the Constitution then so be it.

127 posted on 06/26/2002 10:08:58 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson