Skip to comments.
Aniston topless photo lawsuit set for next week
CNN ^
| 6-25-02
Posted on 06/25/2002 10:23:40 AM PDT by mikenola
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:00:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) -- Actress Jennifer Aniston's lawsuit against two magazine publishers for printing unauthorized photos of her sunbathing topless will proceed next week without a jury, the judge ruled Monday.
U.S. District Judge Ronald Lew said he would conduct a court trial and render a verdict himself - which is permitted for civil cases under federal law - because Aniston's lawyers failed to demand a jury when the lawsuit was filed in 2000.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
1
posted on
06/25/2002 10:23:40 AM PDT
by
mikenola
To: mikenola
The actress, who plays Rachel on the hit comedy "Friends," sued Man's World Publications Inc. and Crescent Publishing Group, claiming that paparazzi scaled an eight-foot wall to photograph her as she sunbathed in the backyard of her home.
If this is true, it's an open-and-shut case for Mrs. Pitt. I'm surprised she didn't go after them for B&E or tresspassing. I would like to see those pictures, though.
To: Hemingway's Ghost
To: mikenola
To: mikenola
If I were the Judge, I would have to see the evident before I could issue a ruling.
5
posted on
06/25/2002 10:40:46 AM PDT
by
Lockbox
To: Hemingway's Ghost
I would like to see those pictures, though. What is the world coming to? Took me less than a minute to find it ;)
To: Hemingway's Ghost
To: A Cyrenian
Now that's a thong.
8
posted on
06/25/2002 10:50:51 AM PDT
by
BikerNYC
To: general_re
Hmmmm.....refresh my memory please: Aniston had a pair of pitiful flat fried eggs until she had some field upgrades installed.
Honestly, I don't understand all the fuss over this mediocre-talent-and-looks 'celebrity.'
To: mikenola
The angle of those shots does not support shooting from the top of an 8-foot wall.
10
posted on
06/25/2002 10:56:42 AM PDT
by
LarryM
To: BikerNYC
You got that right. That's how a thong deserves to be worn.
To: RooRoobird14; All
Actually, in this kind of case, I consider the fuss to be poetic justice. The vast majority of Hollywood actors and actresses are constantly in my face, telling me what to watch, what to think, what to wear, how to vote, and generally acting like infantile self-obsessed publicity hogs. And then they demand
their privacy.
Well, I've got news for Hollywood - if you won't leave me alone, why should you be left alone? Get out of my face, and pictures like this one - freepmail for link ;) - won't show up in trashy Italian magazines.
To: codebreaker
Aw, xed out.
To: RooRoobird14
Honestly, I don't understand all the fuss over this mediocre-talent-and-looks 'celebrity.'
You must be a woman.
To: Hemingway's Ghost
Yes I am, and I can think of at least 500 other actresses who are prettier and have a better body than Jennifer.
To: mikenola
I'll be there for you,
When your top starts to fall
I'll be there for you,
If you'll let me see it all...
To: mikenola
appears this year in the film "The Good Girl."
Yes she is, ....possibly even better than that.
To: mikenola
appears this year in the film "The Good Girl."
Yes she is, ....possibly even better than that.
To: RooRoobird14
Yes I am, and I can think of at least 500 other actresses who are prettier and have a better body than Jennifer.Maybe, but do you have nekkid pics of those 500?
To: All
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
