Posted on 06/25/2002 9:30:26 AM PDT by FresnoDA
SAN DIEGO ---- A police criminalist testified Monday that tiny pieces of evidence ---- hairs and carpet fibers ---- found in David Westerfield's house and motor home could link the Sabre Springs man to Danielle van Dam, the 7-year-old neighbor he is accused of kidnapping and murdering.
Tanya DuLaney, a trace evidence analyst with the San Diego Police Department, said blonde hairs, dog hairs and tan carpet fibers found on Westerfield's property were similar to Danielle's hair, the short brown-gray fur of the van Dam family dog and Danielle's bedroom carpet.
|
|
DuLaney said she could not make a 100 percent match of the hair and fiber evidence.
Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of kidnapping and murdering Danielle. The young girl was reported missing Feb. 2. Her nude and decomposing body was found nearly four weeks later in rural East County.
Westerfield, a twice-divorced design engineer, kept his hands clasped in front of him during Monday's proceedings, occasionally writing notes and consulting with his attorneys.
Danielle's mother, Brenda van Dam, attended the entire hearing. The van Dams live two doors down the street from Westerfield and were passing acquaintances with him. Damon van Dam sat with his wife during the morning session.
Day 12 of Westerfield's trial was dominated by the hair and fiber testimony of DuLaney, who told jurors that light brown-blonde hairs found in Westerfield's motor home and house were similar to Danielle's hair in color, length, diameter. Westerfield has short, dark hair.
Jurors heard testimony that DNA evidence will show Danielle could have left the blonde hairs found on sheets and pillow cases taken from Westerfield's master bedroom ---- the first possible evidence placing the second-grader upstairs in his home.
"They could have come from Danielle van Dam," DuLaney said of tests performed on the hairs. "All six of them."
Further testimony on the hair samples is expected today or later this week when prosecutors are expected to wrap up their side of the case.
Meanwhile, Westerfield's defense attorney, Steven Feldman, focused on what didn't match, having DuLaney go over hair after hair found in the motor home ---- some brown and others color-treated blonde ---- which were determined not to be Danielle's because of color, length or dye.
Earlier in the trial, Brenda van Dam testified her daughter's hair was never dyed and Danielle had a haircut about a week before she disappeared. Van Dam also had testified she took Danielle to Westerfield's house to sell Girl Scout cookies a few days before Danielle disappeared. She testified her daughter went into the house briefly, but did not go upstairs.
The tedium of the fiber and hair testimony prompted Judge William Mudd to give jurors an extra long afternoon break.
Feldman followed the same line of questioning with the carpet fibers, asking about fibers that didn't match. He called attention to a lack of physical evidence putting Danielle in Westerfield's black Toyota 4Runner, the car Westerfield drove when he went to get his motor home on Feb. 2 ---- the morning Danielle was discovered missing.
None of Danielle's hair or blood was found in the vehicle, another police criminalist, David Cornacchia, testified. Nor were any of the carpet fibers lifted from the soles of Westerfield's 25 pairs of shoes similar to Danielle's bedroom carpet, DuLaney said.
Also on Monday, DuLaney told jurors about finding five carpet fibers in Westerfield's motor home that were similar in size and shape to Danielle's bedroom carpet.
She showed jurors enlarged pictures, showing the fibers side by side with those from Danielle's bedroom and magnified 400 times, to illustrate how the fibers were consistent.
Under questioning from Feldman, Westerfield's defense attorney, DuLaney said it was possible that many houses in a development like the Sabre Springs neighborhood where the van Dams and Westerfield lived could have the same carpet.
She also talked about dog hairs found in dryer lint thrown away in Westerfield's garage. More hair was found in the hallway carpet of his motor home, on a bath mat in the motor home and on a white towel. Those hairs were consistent with the hair on van Dam's dog, Leyla, DuLaney testified. Westerfield does not have a dog.
Brenda van Dam testified earlier in the trial that her daughter would often roll around with Leyla, especially after she had changed into her pajamas before going to bed.
While the dog hair found in Westerfield's house and motor home had the unusual pigment formations found in Leyla's hair, DuLaney said she could only say the hairs were similar, not exact matches.
Attempts to perform DNA tests on the hair were unsuccessful, said Holly Ernest, director of the UC Davis veterinary genetics lab. She briefly testified that there was not enough DNA on the dog hair sent to the university for testing to determine whether it belonged to Leyla.
Feldman did not ask Ernest any questions.
Testimony in the case continues today.
Contact staff writer Kimberly Epler at (760) 739-6644 or kepler@nctimes.com.
6/25/02
That said, it seems the discussion tonight is going downhill as fast as it did last night, so I am out of here and going over to the refugee site where the posters are focused on the evidence, and are not into point/counter-point regarding people's opinions of the same...
A few posteres here are really ruining the discussion of the evidence, and don't seem to understand the meaning of either word..
It would seem to me that if he is not convicted on the murder charge, the child porn charges would be dropped.
The evidence of the child porn was obtained via search warrants for a suspected murder.
I may be way off base on this...
The closer to the end this trial gets, the more involved and probably emotional we all will get.
So, The ISSUES are what I am trying to defend or attack, and not my fellow FR's.
BunnySlippers, FresnoDA,~Kim4VRWC's~, and anyone else that feels as if I attacked, I sure apologize to you.
I agree. Kinda like you can't be charged for not wearing a seatbelt if you're not charged with a moving violation.
The evidence today was that
There is more 'circumstantial evidence that Danielle had orange fibers that MAY match orange fibers found in DW's laundry
(2)The is some LIKELY CHILD PORN on disks found in DW's house.
Not proven, is whether he watched the porn.
Not proven is that maybe the reason DW has the orange fibers all over his laundry is that they may be all over everyone's laundry in that neighborhood.
If not, there may be a reason , some item in his house, that they came from. Danielle was in his house and may have been exposed to them.
Anyone else see more of the trial and have more items of evidence to give pros/cons on?
Boy, you need to brush up on ethics. There is ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with forming an opinion about guilt or innocence in a trial before it's over. Got it? I think DW is guilty as per the evidence I have heard so far ...and some people will have formed a different opinion. My opinion shifts daily as the evidence comes in ... this is utterly natural. But most importantly, an attorney will tell you that there is NOTHING wrong with forming an opinion ...
You can't clean smut up not after the Jury has viewed this. CTV analyst said that some in the Jury were looking the other way and wiping away tears. Anyone in my opnion who posses such porn as this that causes the Juryers to flinch, and this person is up for the death sentence, this DW goose is cooked. Theres nothing like real seens depicking what Danielle might have gone through to show the Jury.
I thank I have defended this guy to long. There is to many fibers showing up only on the victom and the Defendent.
He was absolutely right in banning him. But in the eyes of a certain faction around here that means he murdered his daughter. Logic will tell you that is not the case.
As I said earlier, I expect to hear the outrage at those tyoes of opinions as well. Still listening ...
Sometimes the tone of fellow 'debators', such as yourself, encourages one to actually bend a little.
Last I checked, Damon van Dam wasn't on trial, which I know comes as disappointing surprise to many on this FR topic/thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.