Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: captain11
Dr. James Koopman (U of Michigan). Science, volume 296, number 31, May 2002. "Smallpox is a barely contagious and very slow-spreading infection."

Dr. Koopman is incorrect. CDC's own website has this interesting tid-bit (we'll see how long it stays on their website.)

"The potential of aerosolized smallpox to spread over a considerable distance and to infect at low doses was vividly demonstrated in an outbreak in Germany in 1970 (11). That year, a German electrician returning from Pakistan became ill with high fever and diarrhea. On January 11, he was admitted to a local hospital and was isolated in a separate room on the ground floor because it was feared he might have typhoid fever. He had contact with only two nurses over the next 3 days. On January 14 a rash developed, and on January 16 the diagnosis of smallpox was confirmed. He was immediately transported to one of Germany's special isolation hospitals, and more than 100,000 persons were promptly vaccinated. The hospital had been closed to visitors because of an influenza outbreak for several days before the patient was admitted. After the diagnosis of smallpox, other hospital patients and staff were quarantined for 4 weeks and were vaccinated; very ill patients received vaccinia-immune globulin first. However, the smallpox patient had had a cough, a symptom seldom seen with smallpox; coughing can produce a large-volume, small-particle aerosol like what might occur after its use as a terrorist weapon. Subsequently, 19 cases occurred in the hospital, including four in other rooms on the patient's floor, eight on the floor above, and nine on the third floor. Two were contact cases. One of the cases was in a visitor who had spent fewer than 15 minutes in the hospital and had only briefly opened a corridor door, easily 30 feet from the patient's room, to ask directions. Three of the patients were nurses, one of whom died. This outbreak occurred in a well-vaccinated population."

Thinking twice about getting immunized? I would.

33 posted on 06/24/2002 8:00:02 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: bonesmccoy
Good information. Appreciated.
37 posted on 06/24/2002 8:09:09 PM PDT by captain11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: bonesmccoy; Jim Noble
That case is an example of just how hard it is to diagnose smallpox from its initial symptoms. By the time it's diagnosed, it could have spread wide and far and more quickly than most people would like to believe. Me? I prefer not to keep my head in the sand and dammit, I want my kids immunized NOW. And also, as another thought, I would suspect any one denying the feasibility of a wide-spread immunization program, esp. in light of the probability of this being used as a WMD, of being some sort of a shill.
55 posted on 06/24/2002 11:38:41 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson