Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
That’s the Palestinian viewpoint. They fail to recognize that the failure of Oslo was their failure to meet their obligations. To this day the stated objective of the PLO is the destruction of Israel, it has never been abandoned.

In fact, in A Durable Peace, Netanyahu, meeting with Clinton and Arafat at Wye made a condition of getting back some control of the land... the elimination of Article 22. This is the article the calls on the destruction of Israel. Arafat said yes. Clinton said, "there you go." Netanyahu said "we'll see." Well, as soon as Arafat returned to Ramallah, he reneged. He didn't get the land. Clinton is all mad at Netanyahu who could care less (my opinion that) because Clinton took Arafat's yes at face value.

By the way... LOL on the Clinton remark.

1,540 posted on 06/25/2002 1:35:59 PM PDT by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1538 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson; E Rocc
Sorry, clinton remark belongs to Eric.

And Eric, flinching on Lebanon and flinching on settlements two different things in my book.

I'm reading a huge history on Israel, and I just finished the Lebanon campaign.

Everything I've read about Sharon has been negative. I think it would be interesting to read a fair and balanced viewpoint on this great warrior.

1,541 posted on 06/25/2002 1:38:29 PM PDT by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1540 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson