[kristinn]

And ? After being condescended to and insulted on this thread, he gave it back to those who've been insulting the likes of him, Rush and Sean. He said so, himself. He held the mirror up to this site. Ugly view isn't it ?

[Miss Marple]

Did you really read the thread? He started out by posting an attack on the President. When people disagreed, he started the name-calling. I am too tired to go grab all the posts, and it would be redundant, anyway. Go read the thread for yourself.

[A Citizen Reporter]

"Ugly view isn't it ? "

Why? Because he/they don't like what's being said about them? Rush's answer to that was to post an ignorant picture of the typical freeper on his website. Did you support that? I'd wager that Keyes and Klayman don't like what's being said about them on this website either, but such is life in the big political world. Some don't seem to be up to it, IMHO.

[Amelia]

And ? After being condescended to and insulted on this thread, he gave it back to those who've been insulting the likes of him, Rush and Sean. He said so, himself. He held the mirror up to this site. Ugly view isn't it ?

kristinn, are you going to discuss the actual topic of this thread, or are you going to spend the next 300 posts whining about how poor little Mark got his feelings hurt, started calling names like an elementary school student, and then got more insulted when people told him he was acting childish?

Poor little Mark. He has strong opinions and he expresses them forcefully. It shouldn't be surprising, and he shouldn't be insulted, when someone expresses strong opinions back at him.

But his name-calling was childish and uncalled for, and I don't know what you're trying to accomplish by carrying on about how "badly" he was treated.

[Howlin]

Good gracious, HE was the one who started calling people names. I just read through the thread from where he came on, and HE started the sniping.

I'm sorry if defending Bush upsets you so much; I know you think he's not worthy and he's a sellout, but I certainly hope if MY candidate hadn't won, I would have had a little more class than to come around complaining about EVERY SINGLE THING he did. You say we think Bush can do no wrong, and when I asked you, you say he likes dogs. And please don't pull that holier than thou attitude and act like your "side" isn't giving as good as they get; I was damned to hell the night of the stem cell speech.

Would you prefer that you all come on here and say anything you want about him -- how he is a TRAITOR.....how he has sold this country down the river -- how he's worst than Clinton -- without ANYBODY contradicting you?

Your guy lost. This country is majority rule; it does NOT make us wrong because YOU don't agree with him.

I'd really like to know what you want -- do you want us to just STOP supporting the president of the United States?

Are you like DoughtyOne and wish Gore had won?

[justshe]

I'm not sure we're reading the same posts. It appears to me that someone DARED to disagree with holdonow and HE threw the first verbal punch.

[AAABEST]

Holy s###, now the flying monkeys are going after you too? Join the boat we're all evil now, even Rush.

I don't believe the absurd psychology going on around here, there's got to be a clinical name for it as only pathectic loons could be so deluded. Speak evil of the mascott/figurehead/icon and you must be torn to shreds, not debated.

I rarely debate any of them any more, I've found their heads to be completly empty with nothing substantive to offer the arena of ideas, unless your ideas are all geared towards furthering a phoney politicians political career. Their entire vacuous life philosophy revolves around one person and one person only.

Just give 'em a friendly wave once in a while, you'd gain more by debating the slow bagger at the grocery store, at least he'd be willing to listen to reason.