[Freedom2specul8]

Molestors and pedophile collect both hard core child porn, and pics of kids not considered porn, say sexy little cute outfits in catalogs etc...NOW they can collect cartoons. Hey, the supreme court didn't say the cartoons weren't child porn..they said they were legal to possess, right? Do you think people who don't fantasize about having sex with little kids collect pics of kids being raped?..

[sbnsd]

Even IF all 68,000 jpgs were of underaged little kids/girls, Dusek still hasn't proven motive. DW MAY HAVE done it because he has a thing for them, but there's no way to prove it. Danielle's body was too decomposed for any proof of sexual assault, and no one has found semen anywhere; they've asked. Dusek may claim that as motive, but as far as proving it, it's not materializing. If he can prove something somewhere in relation to Danielle before he rests his case, then that's another thing.

If all they can show is that he had kiddie porn, then so far, that'd be the only thing they could prove was he had kiddie porn.

[UCANSEE2]

Kim, there are convicted MOLESTERS and PEDOPHILES by the ton living all around the VD's neighborhood. God knows what they have in their possession. But they weren't investigated and arrested. Why? Because someone told the INVESTIGATORS to go after DW, and the LE was willing to EMBELLISH the statement(also called a LIE) to get a warrant.

Then what followed was a media circus being led by a DA wanting to get re-elected.

DW may or may not be guilty, but this circus hasn't been about him or Danielle for a long time.

[John Jamieson]

You know Kim, I don't like porn, but I have seen some over the years, I know what it is and I know 10s of millions of people in this country have it and or use it for various purposes. I have no doubt that vertually every "swinger" has it in the their house.

It's a said fact, that the instant camera, 8 mm film camera's, home VCRs and portable VCR cameras and home computers all owe a major part of their existance to this "industry" and "hobby".

I'll bet at least half the single men in this country (and half the married ones too!) have porno of some sort in their homes. It is not proof of murder or even motive for murder.