Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jamieson
Here's the opening statement.

. finally, we'll get into why this happened and one last count that we have, possession of the child pornography. not only did the officers search and find what we've talked about so far, but there were other people involved in that search, people who are familiar with computers, how they work, how you can get inside them, what they can tell you. these people were also part of the search team from the san diego homicide department. and these people went also pursuant to this search warrant to the defendant's house. they went to the defendant's upstairs area. they went to the defendant's office where he has his initials on the wall and his computers on the table and his work manuals on the bookshelves.

and they found an envelope stuck up in this bookshelf that had computer things, floppy disks, they'll talk the computer talk to you. and they pulled those out, and they looked at what was on there. and when they did, they found the evidence that supports the child pornography count.

they also found the evidence that indicates why he took her. he had pictures that he had downloaded, taken off the internet and organized, systemized, and labeled.

not only of naked young girls, many of them nude, standing in sexual poses, obviously under eighteen, he had young girls actively involved in a sex act that he had preserved. he had animations, drawings, if you will, of little girls in pigtails, dressed like little girls, being attacked by males, orally, digitally, anally, and vaginally. he also had videos that he had downloaded and preserved, some of which you will see, four or five. some of them have sound. and you will hear what is going on. and you will see what is going on on those videos. and what you will see is basically adult males sexually assaulting a young female. certainly dressed to look like a young female.

700 posted on 06/24/2002 9:58:38 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies ]


To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Well, he was definately wrong about the "floppy disks", the images were on Zip disks and CDROM discs.

The "drawings" aren't illigal.

If he didn't have the facts to support a murder, he must have figured he had to pull out some sort of highly emotional issue.
714 posted on 06/24/2002 10:12:45 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies ]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Sounds like a night at CB's. Don't you wonder WHY the disks were never dusted for prints? They lift the prints, wipe off the cd and poof pop 'em the tray. Not a complicated procedure. It would have locked in who had them. Donca think?

717 posted on 06/24/2002 10:15:09 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson