Replies

True - but it seemed like Feldman was saying that this is something that she would have or should have known about - if LE had thought it important enough to bring to her attention - maybe LE didn't find it important - but why? I hope we find out.
I checked out the thread earlier on mini-teacup's missing little boy - it is teacup's grandson - the abduction is by the father - he is avoiding being served in a custody ruling issue. Hopefully he loves the boy and would not hurt him - you never know though - people do crazy things for revenge and over anger at court rulings. mini-teacup must be a wreck - I hope it's resolved safely.

What exactly would it mean if Feldman can link those chemically treated hairs in the RV to BVD? Could the Aussie tabloid have been right? Or - if the prosecution would then try to counter with cross contamination - like BVD's hair was tracked in by LE or from the cookie sale day or that night at the bar - they'd blow thier whole case. Of course Feldman's innuendo is not fact - but it will be interesting to find out. I think if it is BVD's hair (not just similar to) - the jurors will be so confused - they will feel deceived and find DW innocent.