"Dusek's opening statement about a fiber found in the sheet her body was wrapped in matching a fiber from DW's home. It may have been a fiber in the laundry/laundry room."
I may need to be corrected here, but I was under the impression that opening statements were NOT evidence. At least that is what I thought I heard the judge tell the jury...
Anyone else know more about whether the opening statements are considered to be evidence? This might clear up some of the differences of opinion, in that some of you are considering these statements actual evidence, when they are just rhetoric...;
like=similar=matching=same