Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
I believe that the statement fits elements of this case. When a Judge, Prosecutor, Law enforcement official decides that without benefit of TRIAL or EVIDENCE; Without following our SYSTEM OF JUSTICE and our CONSTITUTION; that they are now the POWER and they can decide who is GUILTY or who is not GUILTY; Then those people are the enemy of OUR CONSTITUTION, our LEGAL SYSTEM, OUR COUNTRY, and are the same as TERRORISTS, because they would MURDER innocent along with guilty for their own selfish purposes.

Bless you, UCANSEE2, because I think you mean well, but are we not in the midst of a TRIAL??? What are you talking about "without the benefit of trial or evidence, etc.???

566 posted on 06/24/2002 7:24:47 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
Bless you, UCANSEE2, because I think you mean well, but are we not in the midst of a TRIAL??? What are you talking about "without the benefit of trial or evidence, etc.???

Yes, we are in the middle of a trial. There are those who did not want a trial. They want DW hung. There is a DA that wanted to jump on this case to make his re-election bid. He doesn't care whether DW is guilty or innocent. He allowed the case to go forward, when it would appear it shouldn't have. He would like to have DW convicted, for his own re-election efforts. He doesn't care that the evidence is really 'limp' and if DW is set free, he won't care about who really did the crime. By then it won't benefit him, so why bother.

Those are examples that support what I was saying.

583 posted on 06/24/2002 7:52:08 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson