[Freedom2specul8]

I appreciate your reply...but disagree with your idea that I'm 'emotional' about it. I have had to file a missing persons report, so I have tremendous empathy for parents who have to do that.

I was curious if you had been following it ..and what you thought about all the emtionally laden words, rumors, innuendos etc., about the vd's over the past few months while some of us just wanted to focus on the crime itself and were called vd apologists for it. Defending the constitution is more important than worrying about a joint or consensual extra-marital affairs too.

Defending the constitution IS more important than personal agendas...but what is ALSO important is defending victims of crime, stopping child porn..etc., and even if DW IS foudn innocent of murder, he should not be let go on child porn charges if jury sees that he had child porn.

[jacquej]

I do not understand the law in California regarding the child porn issue, and have not seen any evidence yet, so really have no opinion regarding whether he is guilty as charged or not. I will be waiting to see this evidence, and will make up my mind then. The PH statements, and the hearsay on the net and in the media do not do it for me.

I know others feel differently about this, and certainly they are entitled to their opinion, as long they don't try to pick fights with me for not agreeing with them.

[Jaded]

So what happens if the porn doesn't come up in the next two days? What happens if it's proven that it's not child porn? What then?

[Jaded]

BTW, its a misdemeanor in the state of California.