[cyncooper]

Jacque, I do thank you for your response. Of course, all of those concepts are not foreign to me.

The fact is there is evidence of Danielle in DW's home and RV and possibly of him and/or his home/RV at the Dehesa site. It is not unreasonable for some to think the police arrested the correct man. It remains to be seen if the prosecution proves their case beyond a reasonable doubt, but so far they've done a good job.

We can disagree without being disagreeable and saying some care about the Constitution (implying those in disagreement don't) and saying some are on par with terrorists.

[jacquej]

I was offering my understanding of MisSterious view of assuming the guilt of a defendant based evidence that appears to some to be highly flawed, with many other possible explanations.

I am assuming she is bothered by what appears to be a rush to judgement, and I can understnad that, as it certainly has happened before in the history of this country, and it is always a danger when it does, not only to the individual accused, but to a group or groups who are seen as suspect.

[demsux]

The fact is there is evidence of Danielle in DW's home and RV and possibly of him and/or his home/RV at the Dehesa site

Where on earth did you hear that they have evidence of DW at Dehesa Rd.?