No.
I have seen evidence of the investigators LYING, the victims and their friends LYING, and LYING REPEATEDLY. I have seen a DA that loves this kind of high profile case, who desperately needed a PERP quickly to try to WIN his re-election bid.
I have seen where the victims have a FRIEND who is a retired policewoman and PERSONAL friend of the INVESTIGATORS and who advised the VD's on what to do and say, and led the investigators around by the NOSE. I have seen the VD's and their friends lie about doing drugs, but more importantly (and less understandably) lie about just about every other aspect of that night. I have seen that one of the people who was at the VD house that evening, so far has not testified. This person also is the only one that apparently (due to being still drunk) told the police something closer to the truth about activities at the bar, and the VD garage. The prosecution apparently is not interested in having anyone on the stand that might tell the truth.
I have seen the VD's tell everyone that Danielle was wearing her favorite PJ's that night. But they were found on her bedroom floor, inside out.
I have seen a defendant that doesn't react like he is guilty. I have seen that testimony about the defendant seems to indicate he is telling the truth.
Add all of this up and in my opinion, you get NOT GUILTY.
Now, if evidence (and I mean real evidence, not this 'similiar' stuff, not tiny miniscule drops of blood that have a reasonable way they could have gotten, while in the meantime tons of evidence at the VD residence goes unchecked), or Westerfield admits to it, Then he is guilty.
Some people will. The same sort that called O.J. innocent because Fuhrman said the N-word years before.