Kimmie, Kimmie, Kimmie, sweetie, all of these witness with scant evidence of Danielle are
Prosecution witnesses. They compiled their evidence list much earlier. Duzek (Dozeoff) only points out the "evidence" that relates to Danielle (IE: DW's guilt) in order to further their case. Feldman has the same evidence lists the prosecution does. He has an obligation to bring out the fact that the other 99 of 100 pieces of evidence were ignored. This is exceedingly relevant. Much the same way the 5 unknown fingerprints on the alleged entrance/exits were largely ignored by prosecution. They had to bring it out so they wouldn't look like they were hiding something. Today it was proven they've tried.
So far the evidence that would make some of us scratch our heads and pick up our comfy chairs and head to the other side have NOT materialized. It is not there.
Where is the rest of the evidence? The dogs? The porn? The bug guy? The solid evidence? Dozeoff has 2 days by his own calendar.
As far as I'm concerned, I didn't do it. I know you're adamant I did.
DA is really going to have rush through the "child porno", and "irrational motorhome trip", to make it in two days. Why 2 and not 3? Are they running out of tea leaves?
Jaded, all opinions count, including yours. Doesn't mean you're right...
" This is exceedingly relevant. Much the same way the 5 unknown fingerprints on the alleged entrance/exits were largely ignored by prosecution. They had to bring it out so they wouldn't look like they were hiding something. Today it was proven they've tried." And let's not forget the 22 cal. shell casing that they forgot to mention until Feldman brought it up.
Could there be a pattern here? My guess is, the jury is wondering the same thing right about now and the defense hasn't even come up to bat yet.