Replies

"They have the same feelings about dw defenders..there's just a bickering back and forth..between 2 groups."

I had promised myself I would not answer another single one of your posts, but I couldn't let this one go. I just couldn't.

Those of us here asking the questions about the prosecution's shaky case are not defending anyone, and certainly not DW. We don't even know the guy.

What we are defending is our American justice system--the way it was intended to work, not the way it's being twisted in this case we're watching now. In our country, we were told from grade school on that we don't execute innocent people. Of course, we have, but the principle is a good one: the prosecution must prove their case with strong evidence before this can happen. Beyond a reasonable doubt. By reasonable, I don't mean any "what if" but good, honest, reasonable doubt. If the citizens don't demand that this criteria be met, our justice system and the legal protections that go with it will go the way of the 2nd Amendment in the liberal states.

By proof, I mean something more than innuendo, rumor, speculation, winks and nudges. They must prove their case with good, hard evidence. The blood on the jacket might approach that criteria, unless Feldman can find a reasonable (not just any) explanation. DW's tissue under her fingernails would have done the trick, also. But grocery lists, newspaper ads (that everyone in the SD country area received), sweating, cooperating with police, and a few stray hairs that could have been cross contamination or carried in on someone's shoes should not rise to the level of a guilty verdict in a death penalty case.

If it does--and it's not impossible that it does--then our beloved country and its Constitution is in trouble. Frankly, I consider people who seek to bypass the justice system simply because they think they know who did it (in any crime) to be enemies of country as much as any other terrorist.

Really, it's less about defending Stealth Ninja Dave and more about what was wrong with the investigation from the begining. Most of us have said "Show us he was with her in her room or at Dehesa, DNA under the fingernails for example and we would gladly see him locked up." We have questioned a number of things from the begining. So should you. Things have never looked right in this, and the farther along the trial goes the more questions are raised. Surely, you see that.

Kim could we compare the Smart case with this one?

In Utah we have a straight up religious family..they are not hanging out with sexual perverts every week end and inviting them into their home to look over the kids. They are not smoking dope in tha garage..

BUT they are suspects..they and the extended family have been checked out carefull

Switch to San Diego the home of hedionism

Mom and Dad screw strangers in the bedroom down the hall from their kids..they get drunk and do drugs in the house. They have drug dealers and perverts in the house

And they are cleared of suspicion in hours That is the problem..swinning cops ,pols afraid of "exposure" what ever reason the VD's and their friends were never really checked out.

I think this is a set up ...but if I am wrong I want the guy hung

But Kim even if the guy is innocent He has lost everything..he is a broken and now poor man..he will NEVER be trusted around kids again..

That jerk on court TV was speculating today about the other hairs..she said Ohhhhh what if this means there were other children....

Lord help us..Can this man have a fair trial..If innocent can he get his good name back?