Unless the van Dams were the first to bring it up, when they gave the LE a Missing Persons Description, then how did anyone know the dog had scratched Danielle? I've asked this before. Did Brenda tell the LE or did Westerfield?
You all keep in mind, that Brenda testified that the scratch was about 3 to 4 inches but that "it didn't bleed".
Seems like one of you Sleuths would know how the dog scratch came into focus?
sw
As I recall, Feldman brought it up at the PH, BUT the judge wouldn't allow it, for some reason or another.
Feldman made a point of following this line of questions with questions to BVD regarding punishing Danielle because she was complaining about the scratch.
Don't ask me for the "source", there is no way that I'm going to look for it!
FWIW