Replies

Actually, when the prosecution had the witness explain the chart..he had her confirm that out of ALL the hairs and fibers etc found in the MH, the hairs discussed on the chart and in questioning represented only a small fraction of hairs found in the MH. They specifically said that the chart represented or showed only a small set of all the sets of hair found in the MH. They were the hairs the technicians/criminalists were searching for.

Thanks, I didn't hear that part.

What Feldman seems to be getting at is there were a lot of animal hairs in the MH that were not looked at very carefully. If they can be shown to come from other dogs in area, or perhaps DWs ex-girlfriend's dog, it would make Layla's hairs less incriminating. Would also show DW had not cleaned out MH vary carefully, contrary to what posters keep telling us.

I must say the large number of Danielle carpet fibers in the MH is very puzzling. How would so many carpet fibers be transfered to the MH? Just from DW walking in her room? From Danielle rolling on carpet and then being carried from room to DW house to MH? If the carpet fibers are picked up that easily, could they not have come from the Girl Scout cookie visit? Is the carpet in Danielle's room different from the rest of the house? Did the witness give a count of how many DW home fibers in MH vs Danielle's room fibers? How about DW home fibers in Danielles room?

Sorry for so many questions. Only listend for a short time today.

So does this mean that if they found 26 long dark brown chemically treated hairs, it wouldn't be brought up? What about red hair. They were selective in what was analyzed. I want the WHOLE picture, not just the convenient parts.